Descriptor
Court Litigation | 2 |
Drug Use Testing | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Public Schools | 2 |
Administrator Role | 1 |
Athletics | 1 |
Boards of Education | 1 |
Due Process | 1 |
Federal Courts | 1 |
Privacy | 1 |
School Law | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Law and Education | 2 |
Author
Orr, Ginger | 1 |
Sultanik, Jeffrey T. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 2 |
Administrators | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Fourth Amendment | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Orr, Ginger – Journal of Law and Education, 2000
Discusses the importance of drug-testing policies for educators by analyzing the recent Sixth Circuit Court of Appeal's decision in "Knox v. Knox." Concludes that mandatory drug testing for educators in safety-sensitive positions will not infringe on the constitutional rights of school employees. (Contains 30 footnotes.) (MLF)
Descriptors: Boards of Education, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing, Elementary Secondary Education

Sultanik, Jeffrey T. – Journal of Law and Education, 1990
In response to an earlier article by Eugene Lincoln, presents two hypothetical cases that respectively deal with the possible effects of drug use on school premises and with a policy governing mandatory urine testing for student athletes. Cites factors that should be incorporated in any mandatory drug testing policy. (MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Athletics, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing