Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Group Discussion | 1 |
| Group Dynamics | 1 |
| Groups | 1 |
| Knowledge Level | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLippold, Matthias; Schulz-Hardt, Stefan; Schultze, Thomas – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2021
One benefit of working in groups is that group members can learn from each other how to perform the task, a phenomenon called group-to-individual transfer (G-I transfer). In the context of quantitative judgments, G-I transfer means that group members improve their individual accuracy as a consequence of exchanging task-relevant information. This…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Task Analysis, Group Discussion, Group Dynamics
