Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Auditory Perception | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Language Variation | 1 |
| Learning Processes | 1 |
| Native Language | 1 |
| North American English | 1 |
| Phonology | 1 |
| Pictorial Stimuli | 1 |
| Pronunciation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Author
| Charoy, Jeanne | 1 |
| Samuel, Arthur G. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCharoy, Jeanne; Samuel, Arthur G. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
In conversational speech, it is very common for words' segments to be reduced or deleted. However, previous research has consistently shown that during spoken word recognition, listeners prefer words' canonical pronunciation over their reduced pronunciations (e.g., pretty pronounced [word omitted] vs. [word omitted]), even when the latter are far…
Descriptors: Pronunciation, Word Recognition, Spelling, Auditory Perception
