Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Eye Movements | 2 |
| Graduate Students | 2 |
| Reading Comprehension | 2 |
| Sentences | 2 |
| Silent Reading | 2 |
| Syntax | 2 |
| Undergraduate Students | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Auditory Stimuli | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPrice, Iya Khelm; Witzel, Naoko; Witzel, Jeffrey – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
This study reports 2 eye-tracking experiments investigating form interference during sentence-level silent reading. The items involved reduced and unreduced relative clauses (RCs) with words that were orthographically and phonologically similar "(injection-infection"; O+P+, Experiment 1) as well as with words that were orthographically…
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Phonology, Reading Processes, Silent Reading
Luo, Yingyi; Yan, Ming; Zhou, Xiaolin – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Prosodic boundaries can be used to guide syntactic parsing in both spoken and written sentence comprehension, but it is unknown whether the processing of prosodic boundaries affects the processing of upcoming lexical information. In 3 eye-tracking experiments, participants read silently sentences that allow for 2 possible syntactic interpretations…
Descriptors: Sentences, Eye Movements, Silent Reading, Cues
