Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| English | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Eye Movements | 1 |
| Reading Processes | 1 |
| Reading Rate | 1 |
| Reading Research | 1 |
| Regression (Statistics) | 1 |
| Semantics | 1 |
| Undergraduate Students | 1 |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Author
| Jia, Annie | 1 |
| Schotter, Elizabeth R. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSchotter, Elizabeth R.; Jia, Annie – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
Theories of preview benefit in reading hinge on integration across saccades and the idea that preview benefit is greater the more similar the preview and target are. Schotter (2013) reported preview benefit from a synonymous preview, but it is unclear whether this effect occurs because of similarity between the preview and target (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Semantics, Eye Movements, Reading Processes, English
