NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Arce-Ferrer, Alvaro J.; Bulut, Okan – Journal of Experimental Education, 2019
This study investigated the performance of four widely used data-collection designs in detecting test-mode effects (i.e., computer-based versus paper-based testing). The experimental conditions included four data-collection designs, two test-administration modes, and the availability of an anchor assessment. The test-level and item-level results…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Test Construction, Test Format, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
DiBattista, David; Sinnige-Egger, Jo-Anne; Fortuna, Glenda – Journal of Experimental Education, 2014
The authors assessed the effects of using "none of the above" as an option in a 40-item, general-knowledge multiple-choice test administered to undergraduate students. Examinees who selected "none of the above" were given an incentive to write the correct answer to the question posed. Using "none of the above" as the…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Testing, Undergraduate Students, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Weiten, Wayne – Journal of Experimental Education, 1984
The effects of violating four item construction principles were examined to assess the validity of the principles and the importance of students' test wiseness. While flawed items were significantly less difficult than sound items, differences in item discrimination, test reliability, and concurrent validity were not observed. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Higher Education, Item Analysis, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sax, Gilbert; And Others – Journal of Experimental Education, 1972
One purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different levels of item complexity on subsequent student achievement to help clarify the effectiveness of the transfer and hierarchical models. (Authors/MB)
Descriptors: Achievement, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Interaction Process Analysis