Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Discrimination Learning | 12 |
| Problem Solving | 12 |
| Elementary School Students | 6 |
| Cognitive Processes | 4 |
| Research | 4 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 3 |
| Responses | 3 |
| Attention | 2 |
| Children | 2 |
| Cues | 2 |
| Mental Retardation | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental Child… | 12 |
Author
| Cantor, Joan H. | 2 |
| Gholson, Barry | 2 |
| Spiker, Charles C. | 2 |
| Andrews, Glenda | 1 |
| Berch, Daniel B. | 1 |
| Boyce, Jillian | 1 |
| Cole, Michael | 1 |
| Danziger, Sheldon | 1 |
| Halford, Graeme S. | 1 |
| House, Betty J. | 1 |
| Mims, R. Michael | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Andrews, Glenda; Halford, Graeme S.; Boyce, Jillian – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2012
Two experiments examined conditional discrimination in 4- to 6-year-olds. Children learned to choose one of two objects (e.g., circle) when the background was, say, red and to choose the other object (e.g., triangle) when the background was, say, blue. Awareness was assessed and interpreted as a marker of relational processing. In Experiment 1,…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Geometric Concepts, Children, Age Differences
Peer reviewedGholson, Barry; Danziger, Sheldon – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1975
Second and sixth grade children solved a series of four-and eight-dimensional discrimination learning problems dictating selection of hypotheses which could be monitored by means of blank trials. Differential effects of stimulus complexity upon the performance of the two age groups are discussed. (GO)
Descriptors: Conceptual Schemes, Discrimination Learning, Elementary School Students, Problem Solving
Peer reviewedCantor, Joan H.; Spiker, Charles C. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1982
Strategies of kindergarten children in discrimination learning were studied in a factorial design with temporal placements of two introtact probes and two types of pretraining. Results support the expectation that the posttrial probe would improve the short-term efficiency of children in both pretraining conditions. (Author/MP)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Discrimination Learning, Hypothesis Testing, Kindergarten Children
Peer reviewedCole, Michael – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1976
A discrimination reversal problem was presented to 192 children varying in age from 3 to 5 years. At the end of both the initial learning and transfer trials, probe trials were introduced to ascertain the response rule describing children's choices. (Author/SB)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Discrimination Learning, Early Childhood Education, Problem Solving
Peer reviewedCantor, Joan H.; Spiker, Charles C. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1978
A specially designed discrimination learning task was used to investigate whether the performance of kindergarten and first grade children could be improved through explicit training with a simple hypothesis-testing strategy. (Author/MP)
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Elementary School Students, Hypothesis Testing, Problem Solving
Peer reviewedSmith, Linda B.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1975
This study is designed to test the hypothesis that an inability to separate incoming information into discrete messages is a source of young children's relatively poor performance in selective attention tasks. Subjects were 27 children drawn from kindergarten, second grade and fifth grade classes. (Author/GO)
Descriptors: Attention, Auditory Stimuli, Cognitive Processes, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewedTragakis, Chris – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1975
Presents two experiments which examined: (1) the tendency to make differential cue-producing responses to the values of dimensions that vary within or between settings; and (2) the hypothesis that children have more experience with problems following a two-choice simultaneous discrimination format than a successive one. Subjects were third- and…
Descriptors: Cues, Dimensional Preference, Discrimination Learning, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedMims, R. Michael; Gholson, Barry – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977
In this study, hypothesis probe techniques were used to provide trial-to-trial monitoring of second and third grade children's use of feedback. (SB)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Discrimination Learning, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedBerch, Daniel B. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1972
Descriptors: Cues, Data Analysis, Discrimination Learning, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewedHouse, Betty J. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1979
Two groups of mentally retarded children (MA: 4 to 8 years) were pretrained using two different methods. It was predicted that shift performance of the two groups trained to use different strategies would resemble those of two different developmental levels. (MP)
Descriptors: Attention, Children, Comparative Analysis, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewedRouth, Donald K.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Discrimination Learning, Learning Processes, Preschool Children
Peer reviewedWeisz, John R. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977
To clarify the roles of IQ and mental age (MA) in hypotheses behavior, MA-matched subjects at three levels of IQ and three levels of MA received blank trial discrimination learning problems using procedures designed to discourage position-oriented responding. (Author/BD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Discrimination Learning, Elementary School Students, Intelligence Differences

Direct link
