Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Computation | 3 |
Mathematical Formulas | 3 |
Statistical Analysis | 3 |
Models | 2 |
Statistical Distributions | 2 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Cluster Grouping | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Monte Carlo Methods | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Educational and… | 3 |
Author
Avi Feller | 1 |
Benjamin Lu | 1 |
Castellano, Katherine E. | 1 |
Eli Ben-Michael | 1 |
Hedges, Larry V. | 1 |
Ho, Andrew D. | 1 |
Luke Miratrix | 1 |
Reardon, Sean F. | 1 |
Shear, Benjamin R. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Benjamin Lu; Eli Ben-Michael; Avi Feller; Luke Miratrix – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2023
In multisite trials, learning about treatment effect variation across sites is critical for understanding where and for whom a program works. Unadjusted comparisons, however, capture "compositional" differences in the distributions of unit-level features as well as "contextual" differences in site-level features, including…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Statistical Distributions, Program Implementation, Comparative Analysis
Reardon, Sean F.; Shear, Benjamin R.; Castellano, Katherine E.; Ho, Andrew D. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2017
Test score distributions of schools or demographic groups are often summarized by frequencies of students scoring in a small number of ordered proficiency categories. We show that heteroskedastic ordered probit (HETOP) models can be used to estimate means and standard deviations of multiple groups' test score distributions from such data. Because…
Descriptors: Scores, Statistical Analysis, Models, Computation
Hedges, Larry V. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2007
A common mistake in analysis of cluster randomized trials is to ignore the effect of clustering and analyze the data as if each treatment group were a simple random sample. This typically leads to an overstatement of the precision of results and anticonservative conclusions about precision and statistical significance of treatment effects. This…
Descriptors: Statistical Significance, Computation, Cluster Grouping, Statistics