NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Knapp, Thomas R. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1979
This paper presents the generalized symmetric means approach to the estimation of population covariances, complete with derivations and examples. Particular attention is paid to the problem of missing data, which is handled very naturally in the incidence sampling framework. (CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Matrices, Sampling, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ashler, Daniel – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1979
The negative bias of biserial correlations in the presence of guessing is demonstrated by Monte Carlo studies, and another estimator is described that is free of such bias. The usual biserial-correlation assumptions and assumptions about guessing are discussed. Brogden's coefficient of selective efficiency and the triserial correlation are…
Descriptors: Correlation, Guessing (Tests), Item Analysis, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shaffer, Juliet Popper – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1979
Two alternative procedures are described for testing the significance of differences of group means. The first consists of a reduction in the critical value when comparing the largest and smallest means. The other alternative uses the unmodified range test without a preliminary F test. An example is provided. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beckett, James, III; Schucany, William R. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1979
The determination of a consensus ranking of products based on the rankings of each judge can be accomplished through the use of a Tukey type multiple comparison procedure. The extension to more than two groups is presented as an analysis of concordance table. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Correlation, Rating Scales, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Games, Paul A.; Howell, John F. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1976
Compares three methods of analyzing pairwise treatment differences in a multi-treatment experiment via computer simulation techniques. Under the equal n condition, the robustness of the conventional Tukey Wholly Significant Difference test (WSD) to heterogeneous variances was contrasted with two alternate techniques. Under unequal n conditions,…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ross, Kenneth N. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1979
It is shown that using formulae for the estimation of sampling errors based on simple random sampling, when a design actually involves cluster sampling, can lead to serious underestimation of error. Jackknife and balanced repeated replication are recommended as techniques for dealing with this problem. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Hypothesis Testing, Research Design, Research Problems