Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Coding | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Alphabets | 1 |
| Books | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Decoding (Reading) | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 2 |
Author
| Cho, Eunsoo | 1 |
| Collins, Alyson A. | 1 |
| Compton, Donald L. | 1 |
| Correnti, Richard J. | 1 |
| Gilbert, Jennifer K. | 1 |
| Kearns, Devin M. | 1 |
| Lindstrom, Esther R. | 1 |
| Patchan, Melissa M. | 1 |
| Schunn, Christian D. | 1 |
| Steacy, Laura M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 1 |
| Woodcock Reading Mastery Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPatchan, Melissa M.; Schunn, Christian D.; Correnti, Richard J. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2016
Although feedback is often seen as a critical component of the learning process, many open questions about how specific feedback features contribute to the effectiveness of feedback remain--especially in regards to peer feedback of writing. Nelson and Schunn (2009) identified several important features of peer feedback in their nature of feedback…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition), Regression (Statistics), Student Improvement
Steacy, Laura M.; Kearns, Devin M.; Gilbert, Jennifer K.; Compton, Donald L.; Cho, Eunsoo; Lindstrom, Esther R.; Collins, Alyson A. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2017
Models of irregular word reading that take into account both child- and word-level predictors have not been evaluated in typically developing children and children with reading difficulty (RD). The purpose of the present study was to model individual differences in irregular word reading ability among 5th grade children (N = 170), oversampled for…
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Word Recognition, Word Frequency, Predictor Variables
