Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Test Format | 3 |
| Testing | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Humor | 1 |
| Innovation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 3 |
Author
| Baldwin, Peter | 1 |
| Clauser, Brian E. | 1 |
| Emons, Wilco H. M. | 1 |
| McMorris, Robert F. | 1 |
| Sijtsma, Klaas | 1 |
| van der Ark, L. Andries | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Baldwin, Peter; Clauser, Brian E. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2022
While score comparability across test forms typically relies on common (or randomly equivalent) examinees or items, innovations in item formats, test delivery, and efforts to extend the range of score interpretation may require a special data collection before examinees or items can be used in this way--or may be incompatible with common examinee…
Descriptors: Scoring, Testing, Test Items, Test Format
van der Ark, L. Andries; Emons, Wilco H. M.; Sijtsma, Klaas – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2008
Two types of answer-copying statistics for detecting copiers in small-scale examinations are proposed. One statistic identifies the "copier-source" pair, and the other in addition suggests who is copier and who is source. Both types of statistics can be used when the examination has alternate test forms. A simulation study shows that the…
Descriptors: Cheating, Statistics, Test Format, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewedMcMorris, Robert F.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1985
Two matched forms of a 50 item grammar test were developed. Twenty items designed to be humorous were included in one form. Inclusion of humorous items did not affect grammar scores on matched humorous/nonhumorous items, nor on commmon post-treatment items. Inclusion did not affect results of anxiety measures. (Author/DWH)
Descriptors: Grade 8, Humor, Junior High Schools, Performance Factors

Direct link
