Descriptor
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 7 |
Author
| Rowley, Glenn L. | 2 |
| Linn, Robert L. | 1 |
| Livingston, Samuel A. | 1 |
| Norcini, John J. | 1 |
| Smith, Jeffrey K. | 1 |
| Smith, Robert L. | 1 |
| Van der Linden, Wim J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 7 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedNorcini, John J.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1988
Multiple matrix sampling is applied to a variation of Angoff's standard setting method. Thirty-six experts (internists) and 190 items were divided into five groups, and borderline examinee performance was estimated. There was some variability in the cutting scores produced by the individual groups, but various components were well estimated. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Minimum Competency Testing, Physicians, Sampling
Peer reviewedLivingston, Samuel A. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1982
To set a standard on the "beardedness" test (see TM 507 062) the probability that a student with a specific score will be judged as bearded must be estimated for each test score. To get an unbiased estimate of that probability, a representative sample of students at each test score level must be chosen. (BW)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Evaluation Methods, Graduation Requirements, Minimum Competency Testing
Peer reviewedRowley, Glenn L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1982
Livingston's (TM 507 218) response to Rowley (TM 507 062) is compared with the original Zieky and Livingston formulation of the Contrasting Groups Method of setting standards. (BW)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Evaluation Methods, Graduation Requirements, Minimum Competency Testing
Peer reviewedVan der Linden, Wim J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1982
An ignored aspect of standard setting, namely the possibility that Angoff or Nedelsky judges specify inconsistent probabilities (e.g., low probabilities for easy items but large probabilities for hard items) is explored. A latent trait method is proposed to estimate such misspecifications, and an index of consistency is defined. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Latent Trait Theory, Mastery Tests, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewedRowley, Glenn L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1982
Survey research establishes that beardedness correlates with many desired outcomes and supports that a minimal level of beardedness be set as a prerequisite for high school graduation. Research problems of concept clarification, domain-definition, instrument development, and standard setting methods are discussed. The political considerations of…
Descriptors: Administrative Principles, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Dress Codes
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1978
Political and educational consequences of standard setting for criterion-referenced tests are discussed. Suggestions for setting standards are given. (JKS)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Criterion Referenced Tests, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedSmith, Robert L.; Smith, Jeffrey K. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1988
The use by 31 reading specialists, compensatory education teachers, and secondary reading teachers of Angoff and Nedelsky methods for setting cutting scores for a high-school graduation test in reading comprehension was studied. The Angoff method provides a wider variety of information and yields estimates closer to actual p values. (TJH)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Graduation Requirements, High Schools, Item Analysis


