NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Debeer, Dries; Janssen, Rianne – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2013
Changing the order of items between alternate test forms to prevent copying and to enhance test security is a common practice in achievement testing. However, these changes in item order may affect item and test characteristics. Several procedures have been proposed for studying these item-order effects. The present study explores the use of…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Test Items, Test Format, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wainer, Howard; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1994
The comparability of scores on test forms that are constructed through examinee item choice is examined in an item response theory framework. The approach is illustrated with data from the College Board's Advanced Placement Test in Chemistry taken by over 18,000 examinees. (SLD)
Descriptors: Advanced Placement, Chemistry, Comparative Analysis, Constructed Response
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Katz, Irvin R.; Bennett, Randy Elliot; Berger, Aliza E. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2000
Studied the solution strategies of 55 high school students who solved parallel constructed response and multiple-choice items that differed only in the presence of response options. Differences in difficulty between response formats did not correspond to differences in strategy choice. Interprets results in light of the relative comprehension…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Constructed Response, Difficulty Level, High School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bennett, Randy Elliot; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1989
Causes of differential item difficulty for blind students taking the braille edition of the Scholastic Aptitude Test's mathematical section were studied. Data for 261 blind students were compared with data for 8,015 non-handicapped students. Results show an association between selected item categories and differential item functioning. (TJH)
Descriptors: Braille, College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Frisbie, David A.; Sweeney, Daryl C. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1982
A 100-item five-choice multiple choice (MC) biology final exam was converted to multiple choice true-false (MTF) form to yield two content-parallel test forms comprised of the two item types. Students found the MTF items easier and preferred MTF over MC; the MTF subtests were more reliable. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Biology, College Science, Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wise, Steven L.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1992
Performance of 156 undergraduate and 48 graduate students on a self-adapted test (SFAT)--students choose the difficulty level of their test items--was compared with performance on a computer-adapted test (CAT). Those taking the SFAT obtained higher ability scores and reported lower posttest state anxiety than did CAT takers. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level