Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 6 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
| Creativity | 10 |
| Validity | 10 |
| College Students | 3 |
| Creative Thinking | 3 |
| Evidence | 3 |
| Foreign Countries | 3 |
| Creativity Tests | 2 |
| Factor Analysis | 2 |
| Gender Differences | 2 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Creative Behavior | 10 |
Author
| Botella, Marion | 1 |
| Cheng, Vivian M. Y. | 1 |
| De Schryver, Luc | 1 |
| Dostál, Daniel | 1 |
| Hsueh-Hua Chuang | 1 |
| Hui, Anna N. N. | 1 |
| Isaksen, Scott G. | 1 |
| Jansen, Karen J. | 1 |
| Li, Huihui | 1 |
| Li, Mingzhu | 1 |
| Luo, Hualin | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 10 |
| Reports - Research | 7 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| NEO Five Factor Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Zhou, Zhijin; Zhang, Hongpo; Li, Mingzhu; Sun, Cuicui; Luo, Hualin – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2021
Zhongyong thinking is a common approach adopted by Chinese people to solve problems encountered in life and work. Based on the four modes of zhongyong thinking proposed by Pang (Social Sciences in China, 1, 1980, 75), this study chooses the "neither A nor B" form, which represents the "mean" ([Chinese character omitted])…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Thinking Skills, Problem Solving, Priming
Zhang, Gang; Li, Huihui; Yan, Shimei – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2021
This study provides insight into the role of expertise in the process of team creativity. Existing process models, that is, the random variation model and the creative synthesis model, either fail to treat team as an independent creative entity or neglect the differentiation in the voice of individual members in team creative process. In contrast,…
Descriptors: Expertise, Teamwork, Creativity, Models
Pui Yi Mok; Hsueh-Hua Chuang; Ming-Min Cheng; Thomas J. Smith – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
Considering the pivotal role of creativity across various eras and the rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in both creative processes and education, this study introduces and provides validity evidence for the AI-assisted Creativity Questionnaire (AICQ). This new 16-item instrument aims to quantify human creative potential in…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Creativity, Technology Integration, Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Botella, Marion; Nelson, Julien; Zenasni, Franck – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2019
Although the first research on the creative process was based on interviews with the aim of identifying the main stages (macro-process), in the last 50 years researchers have focused more on the analysis of micro-processes, i.e., the mechanisms underlying the generation of ideas. This interest in the micro-processes is partly a result of the tools…
Descriptors: Observation, Diaries, Creativity, Brainstorming
Cheng, Vivian M. Y. – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2018
Creativity in teaching is a significant and complex construct. However, in the local educational context, creativity in teaching has received little attention. This study aimed to investigate the validity, practicality, and benefits of applying a modified consensual assessment technique (CAT) to assess creativity in teaching design. Four hundred…
Descriptors: Creativity, Design, Creative Teaching, Validity
Dostál, Daniel; Plháková, Alena; Záškodná, Tereza – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2017
This study aimed to explore self-reported domain-specific creativity in relation to the level of empathy, systemizing, and the Big Five personality dimensions. The research sample consisted of 1112 college students to whom the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS), the Creative Achievement Questionnaire (CAQ), Baron-Cohen's empathy and…
Descriptors: Creativity, Empathy, Gender Differences, Personality Traits
Hui, Anna N. N. – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2015
This commentary focuses on the challenging views and creative insights inspired by the four articles in this special issue of the journal. The studies have integrated creativity research with social psychological and cultural perspectives. I have highlighted the unique contribution of how Karwowski, Tanggaard, Glaveanu, and Hennessey have each…
Descriptors: Creativity, Social Theories, Psychology, Cultural Context
Plucker, Jonathan A.; Qian, Meihua; Wang, Shujuan – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2011
Divergent thinking (DT) tests are among the most popular techniques for measuring creativity. However, the validity evidence for DT tests, as applied in educational settings, is inconsistent partly due to different scoring methods. This study explored the reliability and validity issues of various techniques for administering and scoring two DT…
Descriptors: Evidence, Creativity, Educational Research, Validity
Isaksen, Scott G.; De Schryver, Luc; Onkelinx, Jonas – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2010
Creativity and Creative Problem Solving are globally important. This study examined the cross-cultural applicability of creative problem solving styles by translating VIEW: An Assessment of Problem Solving Style from its native English into Dutch and examining its psychometric properties and preliminary validation evidence. In general, support was…
Descriptors: Translation, Problem Solving, Factor Analysis, Psychometrics
Peer reviewedSchoenfeldt, Lyle F.; Jansen, Karen J. – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1997
Discusses the definition of creativity and the broad methodological issues associated with organizational creativity. Reviews the most relevant theoretical models for studying creativity in organizations. Specific methodological requirements for studying creativity in organizations are then discussed, with emphasis on issues of validity and…
Descriptors: Creativity, Evaluation Methods, Institutional Characteristics, Models

Direct link
