NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 31 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sukru Murat Cebeci; Selcuk Acar – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
This study presents the Cebeci Test of Creativity (CTC), a novel computerized assessment tool designed to address the limitations of traditional open-ended paper-and-pencil creativity tests. The CTC is designed to overcome the challenges associated with the administration and manual scoring of traditional paper and pencil creativity tests. In this…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Test Construction, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yan Li; Zhe Gong; Pei Xie – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
This study developed and validated the Malevolent Sadistic Creativity Behavior Tendencies Scale (MSCBTS), a tool designed to assess the prevalence of malevolent sadistic creativity behavior tendencies in individuals. The scale was administered online, yielding 1197 valid responses. To ensure robust data analysis, the sample was randomly divided…
Descriptors: Creativity, Measures (Individuals), Test Construction, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Janika Saretzki; Rosalie Andrae; Boris Forthmann; Mathias Benedek – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
Divergent thinking (DT) ability is widely regarded as a central cognitive capacity underlying creativity, but its assessment is challenged by the fact that DT tasks yield a variable number of responses. Various approaches for the scoring of DT tasks have been proposed, which differ in how responses are evaluated and aggregated within a task. The…
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Creativity Tests, Scoring, Metacognition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Elisondo, Romina Cecilia – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2021
This article introduces the Creative Actions Scale (CAS), a Spanish self-report assessment of individual differences in creative actions. The CAS consists of independent scales that assess the frequency of engagement in everyday creative actions across seven domains: Literature, Plastic Arts and Crafts, Science and Technology, Scenic Arts, Music,…
Descriptors: Creativity Tests, Individual Differences, Adults, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chenxi Liu; Leqi Li; Zhe Gong – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2024
In the current research, we developed and tested a Cyber Malevolent Creativity Behavior Scale (CMCBS), which contains 11 items in three dimensions and aims to measure the degree of individuals' cyber malevolent creativity through malevolent creative behaviors in their lives. The results revealed satisfactory reliability with Cronbach's [alpha]…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Test Validity, Creativity, Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nicolas Pichot; Boris Forthmann; Eric Bonetto; Thomas Arciszewski; Nathalie Bonnardel; Sara Jaubert; Jean B. Pavani – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2024
The term "creative" is commonly used in everyday language and in academic discourse to discuss the nature of artistic and innovative productions. This usage inherently implies the existence of a variable of creativity that allows different creative works to be compared. The standard definition of creativity asserts that a production must…
Descriptors: Creativity, Test Construction, Test Validity, Productive Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yongzhong Yang; Haoran Xu – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), AI creativity has demonstrated significant potential for application across various fields. This study aims to explore the multidimensional characteristics of AI creativity from the audience's perspective and to develop a corresponding measurement scale. Specifically, Study 1 utilized…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Creativity, Measures (Individuals), Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sternberg, Robert J. – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2020
Creativity testing as it is now done is often based on a defective assumption that different kinds of creativity can be compressed into a single unidimensional scale. There is no reason to believe that the different kinds of creativity represent, simply, different amounts of a single unidimensional construct. The article shows how three different…
Descriptors: Creativity Tests, Test Validity, Misconceptions, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Duan, Wenjie; Li, Yumei – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2020
This study examined the validity of a 14-item two-factor person-environment fit scale for creativity (PEFSC) to measure the personal and environmental components of creativity. A sample of 2,475 participants completed the PEFSC for evaluating the factor structure. For convergent, discriminant, and incremental validities, a subsample (N = 362)…
Descriptors: Creativity, Innovation, Measures (Individuals), Goodness of Fit
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Qian, Meihua; Wang, Xianyong – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2020
Creativity has been well studied in the past several decades, and numerous measures have been developed to assess creativity. However, validity evidence associated with each measure is often mixed. In particular, the social consequence aspect of validity has received little attention. This is partly due to the difficulty of testing for…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Testing, Creativity Tests, Creative Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tan, Chee-Seng; Ong, Anna Wen-Huey – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2019
The 13-item self-rated creativity scale (SRCS) initially developed for supervisory rating of employees' creativity was modified by some researchers and used as a self-report of creativity. However, it is not clear if the modified SRCS is psychometrically sound. The present study addressed this gap in three studies (N = 1,033). The exploratory…
Descriptors: Creativity, Employees, Evaluation Methods, Psychometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Werner, Christian H.; Tang, Min; Kruse, Joachim; Kaufman, James C.; Spörrle, Matthias – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2014
The present study examines the factor structure of a Chinese version of the Revised Creativity Domain Questionnaire (CDQ-R; Kaufman, Waterstreet, Ailaouni, Whitcomb, Roe, & Riggs, 2009) as well as its relation to Big Five personality traits within a Chinese sample (N = 787). Analyses indicate the appropriateness of the Chinese version of the…
Descriptors: Questionnaires, Creativity Tests, Chinese, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Torrance, E. Paul – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1971
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Motivation, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Gudmund J. W.; Carlsson, Ingegerd – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1987
A new creativity test is described that is based on the percept-genetic theory, which presumes that percepts are built by ultra-short, mostly preconscious processes. The test uses a still-life with two main structures, which is shown in two series of presentations differing in length. Results of experiments using the test are described. (Author/KM)
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Creativity, Creativity Research, Creativity Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rimm, Sylvia; Davis, Gary A. – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1980
It is concluded, among other things, that although GIFT criterion related validity is modest, it predicts creativity about as well as other more complicated instruments, and its reliability is much better than teacher ratings or nominations; and that it also appears to have international and cross cultural face validity. (DLS)
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Research, Creativity Tests, Cross Cultural Studies
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3