Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 3 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 3 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
| Test Items | 6 |
| Creativity Tests | 5 |
| Creative Thinking | 4 |
| Creativity | 4 |
| Scores | 4 |
| Foreign Countries | 3 |
| Achievement Tests | 2 |
| International Assessment | 2 |
| Secondary School Students | 2 |
| Self Efficacy | 2 |
| Test Use | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Creative Behavior | 6 |
Author
| Selcuk Acar | 2 |
| B. Barbot | 1 |
| B. Goecke | 1 |
| Badia, Toni | 1 |
| Hong, Eunsook | 1 |
| Klein, Ariel | 1 |
| O'Neil, Harold F., Jr. | 1 |
| Peng, Yun | 1 |
| Qu, Li | 1 |
| S. Weiss | 1 |
| Sukru Murat Cebeci | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| China (Guangzhou) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Program for International… | 2 |
| Remote Associates Test | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sukru Murat Cebeci; Selcuk Acar – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
This study presents the Cebeci Test of Creativity (CTC), a novel computerized assessment tool designed to address the limitations of traditional open-ended paper-and-pencil creativity tests. The CTC is designed to overcome the challenges associated with the administration and manual scoring of traditional paper and pencil creativity tests. In this…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Test Construction, Test Validity
B. Goecke; S. Weiss; B. Barbot – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
The present paper questions the content validity of the eight creativity-related self-report scales available in PISA 2022's context questionnaire and provides a set of considerations for researchers interested in using these indexes. Specifically, we point out some threats to the content validity of these scales (e.g., "creative thinking…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creativity Tests, Questionnaires, Content Validity
Selcuk Acar; Yuyang Shen – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
Creativity tests, like creativity itself, vary widely in their structure and use. These differences include instructions, test duration, environments, prompt and response modalities, and the structure of test items. A key factor is task structure, referring to the specificity of the number of responses requested for a given prompt. Classic…
Descriptors: Creativity, Creative Thinking, Creativity Tests, Task Analysis
Klein, Ariel; Badia, Toni – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2015
In this study we show how complex creative relations can arise from fairly frequent semantic relations observed in everyday language. By doing this, we reflect on some key cognitive aspects of linguistic and general creativity. In our experimentation, we automated the process of solving a battery of Remote Associates Test tasks. By applying…
Descriptors: Language Usage, Semantics, Natural Language Processing, Test Items
Tan, Chee-Seng; Qu, Li – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2015
Although experimentally induced positive mood can generally last for 20 min and the induced mood is conducive to creative performance, it is still unclear whether the facilitation effect is stable during these 20 min. Two studies were conducted to examine this issue while controlling for the impacts of task switching, practice effect, and test…
Descriptors: Psychological Patterns, Creativity, Test Items, Drills (Practice)
Hong, Eunsook; Peng, Yun; O'Neil, Harold F., Jr.; Wu, Junbin – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2013
The study examined the effects of gender and item content of domain-general and domain-specific creative-thinking tests on four subscale scores of creative-thinking (fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration). Chinese tenth-grade students (234 males and 244 females) participated in the study. Domain-general creative thinking was measured…
Descriptors: Creative Thinking, Creativity Tests, Gender Differences, Test Items

Peer reviewed
Direct link
