Descriptor
| Behavior Patterns | 8 |
| Sensitivity Training | 8 |
| Group Dynamics | 5 |
| Trainers | 4 |
| Interpersonal Relationship | 3 |
| Laboratory Training | 3 |
| Groups | 2 |
| Interpersonal Competence | 2 |
| Training Laboratories | 2 |
| Training Methods | 2 |
| Anxiety | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Applied Behavioral… | 8 |
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBare, Carole E.; Mitchell, Rie R. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1972
The results of the study indicate that sensitivity training does produce positive behavioral changes. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Behavior Patterns, Evaluation, Intervention
Peer reviewedLuke, Robert A., Jr. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1972
This study attempts to articulate the internal normative structure of sensitivity training groups by identifying the normative patterns that govern member behavior and by examining the relative influence exercised by trainer and member over the establishment and maintenance of group norms. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Group Dynamics, Group Norms, Group Structure
Peer reviewedLundgren, David C. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
Developmental trends in two 10-man training groups were studied by checklist and rating scale techniques throughout a four-day laboratory. Differences in the developmental patterns of the two T Groups are interpreted as consequences of the contrasting approaches of the trainers. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Group Dynamics, Groups, Sensitivity Training
Peer reviewedLubin, Bernard; Lubin, Alice W. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
The present study extends the understanding of the level of emotional arousal produced by T Groups by providing a comparison with the college examination. (Author)
Descriptors: Anxiety, Behavior Patterns, Emotional Experience, Laboratory Training
Peer reviewedBolman, Lee – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
Among the effects of trainers on their T Groups was that trainer empathy and security were related to liking for the trainer and perceived member learning. Trainer affection, tendencies to reward and punish, and openess showed no or little relationship to participant learning. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Empathy, Group Dynamics, Human Relations
Peer reviewedFrankiel, Harry H. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
In the present study, members of two trainer groups did not form relationships which were both mutually therapeutic and confronting so frequently as did members of one trainer groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewedKeutzer, Carolin S.; And Others – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
A laboratory learning intervention in a new high school had a durable effect upon both faculty and students; (a) teachers exhibited greater interpersonal openness and acceptance of conflict, and (b) students saw the faculty as more receptive and themselves as more responsible and coactive, both in and out of the classroom. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Consultants, Consultation Programs, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewedAlderfer, Clayton, P.; Lodahl, Thomas M. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
A comparison between a T-Group course and a more traditional human relations course indicated the following findings: the T-Group course showed more here-and-now behavior, more group dynamics and less organizational dynamics content, more involvement, more perceived transfer of learning, and more percieved comfort with feelings. (Author/BY)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Classroom Research, Graduate Students, Group Dynamics


