Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Discrimination Learning | 4 |
Prompting | 4 |
Autism | 2 |
Children | 2 |
Instructional Effectiveness | 2 |
Adolescents | 1 |
Auditory Stimuli | 1 |
Behavioral Science Research | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Cues | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Applied Behavior… | 4 |
Author
Glat, Rosana | 1 |
Leaf, Justin B. | 1 |
Schreibman, Laura | 1 |
Sheldon, Jan B. | 1 |
Sherman, James A. | 1 |
Steege, Mark W. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Leaf, Justin B.; Sheldon, Jan B.; Sherman, James A. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2010
This study compared no-no prompting procedures to simultaneous prompting procedures for 3 children with autism. Using a parallel treatments design, researchers taught rote math skills, receptive labels, or answers to "wh-" questions with both prompting systems. Results indicated that no-no prompting was effective in teaching all skills. By…
Descriptors: Autism, Prompting, Discrimination Learning, Mathematics Skills

Schreibman, Laura – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975
Descriptors: Auditory Stimuli, Autism, Children, Discrimination Learning

Steege, Mark W.; And Others – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1987
The study compared the effectiveness of a traditional training procedure (least-to-most restrictive prompt sequence) and a prescriptive training procedure (utilizing ongoing behavioral assessment data to identify discriminative stimuli) with four severely/multiply handicapped students (ages 11-19). Results indicated both procedures were effective…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Discrimination Learning, Efficiency, Instructional Effectiveness

Glat, Rosana; And Others – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1994
This case study describes initially unsuccessful attempts to use the delayed-cue procedure to teach conditional discriminations to a 25-year-old male with moderate mental retardation. The subject typically waited for the delayed cue unless differential responses to the dictated samples (repeating the sample names) were required. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Case Studies, Cues, Discrimination Learning