Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Discrimination Learning | 3 |
Males | 3 |
Autism | 2 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Receptive Language | 2 |
Auditory Stimuli | 1 |
Conditioning | 1 |
Control Groups | 1 |
Experimental Groups | 1 |
Identification | 1 |
Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Applied Behavior… | 3 |
Author
Petursdottir, Anna Ingeborg | 2 |
Aguilar, Gabriella | 1 |
Carr, James E. | 1 |
Esch, Barbara E. | 1 |
Grow, Laura L. | 1 |
Kodak, Tiffany | 1 |
Lepper, Tracy L. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Kindergarten | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Petursdottir, Anna Ingeborg; Aguilar, Gabriella – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2016
Receptive identification is usually taught in matching-to-sample format, which entails the presentation of an auditory sample stimulus and several visual comparison stimuli in each trial. Conflicting recommendations exist regarding the order of stimulus presentation in matching-to-sample trials. The purpose of this study was to compare acquisition…
Descriptors: Kindergarten, Males, Receptive Language, Identification
Grow, Laura L.; Kodak, Tiffany; Carr, James E. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2014
Previous research has demonstrated that the conditional-only method (starting with a multiple-stimulus array) is more efficient than the simple-conditional method (progressive incorporation of more stimuli into the array) for teaching receptive labeling to children with autism spectrum disorders (Grow, Carr, Kodak, Jostad, & Kisamore, 2011).…
Descriptors: Autism, Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Teaching Methods, Receptive Language
Lepper, Tracy L.; Petursdottir, Anna Ingeborg; Esch, Barbara E. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2013
We evaluated the effects of operant discrimination training (ODT) on the vocalizations of 3 boys with autism. We compared ODT to a stimulus-stimulus pairing (SSP) condition and a control condition in an adapted alternating-treatments design. ODT increased the target vocalizations of all participants compared to the control condition, and its…
Descriptors: Operant Conditioning, Discrimination Learning, Males, Autism