Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Constructivism (Learning) | 1 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Grades (Scholastic) | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Handheld Devices | 1 |
| Incentives | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Responses | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Interactive Learning… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWhite, Peter; Syncox, David; Alters, Brian – Interactive Learning Environments, 2011
Using classroom response systems (clickers) to accumulate grade-points has become a controversial practice as response systems have become more widely used in the last decade. Although some instructors opt to use clickers on a non-grades basis, it has become quite common to reward students for (a) correct answers, (b) participating in clicker…
Descriptors: Constructivism (Learning), Cheating, Grades (Scholastic), Rewards
