Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 9 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 9 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 10 |
Descriptor
Source
| Interactive Learning… | 10 |
Author
| Narmeen Zakaria Bawany | 2 |
| Anita Pásztor-Kovács | 1 |
| Attila Pásztor | 1 |
| Bo Pei | 1 |
| Dharani, B. | 1 |
| Duan, Qinglong | 1 |
| Geetha, T. V. | 1 |
| Gwo-Jen Hwang | 1 |
| Gyöngyvér Molnár | 1 |
| Hanxiang Du | 1 |
| Huang, Yuwei | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 10 |
| Reports - Research | 6 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Postsecondary Education | 3 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hanxiang Du; Wanli Xing; Bo Pei – Interactive Learning Environments, 2023
Participating in online communities has significant benefits to students learning in terms of students' motivation, persistence, and learning outcomes. However, maintaining and supporting online learning communities is very challenging and requires tremendous work. Automatic support is desirable in this situation. The purpose of this work is to…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Communities of Practice, Automation, Artificial Intelligence
Tan, Hongye; Wang, Chong; Duan, Qinglong; Lu, Yu; Zhang, Hu; Li, Ru – Interactive Learning Environments, 2023
Automatic short answer grading (ASAG) is a challenging task that aims to predict a score for a given student response. Previous works on ASAG mainly use nonneural or neural methods. However, the former depends on handcrafted features and is limited by its inflexibility and high cost, and the latter ignores global word cooccurrence in a corpus and…
Descriptors: Automation, Grading, Computer Assisted Testing, Graphs
Zhang, Lishan; Huang, Yuwei; Yang, Xi; Yu, Shengquan; Zhuang, Fuzhen – Interactive Learning Environments, 2022
Automatic short-answer grading has been studied for more than a decade. The technique has been used for implementing auto assessment as well as building the assessor module for intelligent tutoring systems. Many early works automatically grade mainly based on the similarity between a student answer and the reference answer to the question. This…
Descriptors: Automation, Grading, Models, Artificial Intelligence
Kanwal Zahoor; Narmeen Zakaria Bawany – Interactive Learning Environments, 2024
Mobile application developers rely largely on user reviews for identifying issues in mobile applications and meeting the users' expectations. User reviews are unstructured, unorganized and very informal. Identifying and classifying issues by extracting required information from reviews is difficult due to a large number of reviews. To automate the…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Oriented Programs, Courseware, Learning Processes
Soomaiya Hamid; Narmeen Zakaria Bawany – Interactive Learning Environments, 2024
E-learning is the process of sharing knowledge out of the traditional classrooms through different online tools using internet. The availability and use of these tools are not easy for every student. Many institutions gather e-learning feedback to know the problems of students to improve their systems. In e-learning systems, typically a high…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Electronic Learning, Automation, Classification
Saha, Sujan Kumar; Rao C. H., Dhawaleswar – Interactive Learning Environments, 2022
Assessment plays an important role in education. Recently proposed machine learning-based systems for answer grading demand a large training data which is not available in many application areas. Creation of sufficient training data is costly and time-consuming. As a result, automatic long answer grading is still a challenge. In this paper, we…
Descriptors: Middle School Students, Grading, Artificial Intelligence, Automation
Anita Pásztor-Kovács; Attila Pásztor; Gyöngyvér Molnár – Interactive Learning Environments, 2023
In this paper, we present an agenda for the research directions we recommend in addressing the issues of realizing and evaluating communication in CPS instruments. We outline our ideas on potential ways to improve: (1) generalizability in Human-Human assessment tools and ecological validity in Human-Agent ones; (2) flexible and convenient use of…
Descriptors: Cooperation, Problem Solving, Evaluation Methods, Teamwork
Lu-Ho Hsia; Gwo-Jen Hwang; Jan-Pan Hwang – Interactive Learning Environments, 2024
To improve students' sports skills performance, it is important to engage them in reflective practice. However, in physical classes, a teacher generally needs to face a number of students, and hence it is almost impossible to provide detailed guidance or feedback to individual students. Scholars have been trying to use Artificial Intelligence (AI)…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Physical Education, Feedback (Response)
Yung-Hsiang Hu; Jo Shan Fu; Hui-Chin Yeh – Interactive Learning Environments, 2024
Artificial intelligence aims to restructure and process re-engineering education and teaching processes and accelerate the evolution of the whole education system from information to intelligence. Robotic Process Automation (RPA) robots learn by observing people at work, analyzing user processes repeatedly, and adjusting or correcting automated…
Descriptors: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Robotics, Automation, Instructional Effectiveness
Premlatha, K. R.; Dharani, B.; Geetha, T. V. – Interactive Learning Environments, 2016
E-learning allows learners individually to learn "anywhere, anytime" and offers immediate access to specific information. However, learners have different behaviors, learning styles, attitudes, and aptitudes, which affect their learning process, and therefore learning environments need to adapt according to these differences, so as to…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Profiles, Automation, Classification

Peer reviewed
Direct link
