NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Darvishi, Ali; Khosravi, Hassan; Rahimi, Afshin; Sadiq, Shazia; Gasevic, Dragan – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2023
Engaging students in creating learning resources has demonstrated pedagogical benefits. However, to effectively utilize a repository of student-generated content (SGC), a selection process is needed to separate high- from low-quality resources as some of the resources created by students can be ineffective, inappropriate, or incorrect. A common…
Descriptors: Student Developed Materials, Educational Assessment, Peer Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gerardo Ibarra-Vazquez; Maria Soledad Ramirez-Montoya; Mariana Buenestado-Fernandez – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2024
This article aims to study the performance of machine learning models in forecasting gender based on the students' open education competency perception. Data were collected from a convenience sample of 326 students from 26 countries using the eOpen instrument. The analysis comprises 1) a study of the students' perceptions of knowledge, skills, and…
Descriptors: Gender Differences, Open Education, Cross Cultural Studies, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moonen-van Loon, Joyce M. W.; Govaerts, Marjan; Donkers, Jeroen; van Rosmalen, Peter – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2022
Self-directed learning is generally considered a key competence in higher education. To enable self-directed learning, assessment practices increasingly embrace assessment for learning rather than the assessment of learning, shifting the focus from grades and scores to provision of rich, narrative, and personalized feedback. Students are expected…
Descriptors: Competency Based Education, Portfolios (Background Materials), Feedback (Response), Independent Study
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Beasley, Zachariah J.; Piegl, Les A.; Rosen, Paul – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2021
Accurately grading open-ended assignments in large or massive open online courses is nontrivial. Peer review is a promising solution but can be unreliable due to few reviewers and an unevaluated review form. To date, no work has leveraged sentiment analysis in the peer-review process to inform or validate grades or utilized aspect extraction to…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Online Courses, Assignments, Peer Evaluation