Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Source
| Grantee Submission | 4 |
Author
| Danielle S. McNamara | 2 |
| Ahmed Ashraf Butt | 1 |
| Allen, Laura K. | 1 |
| Elizabeth Reilley | 1 |
| Ishrat Ahmed | 1 |
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 1 |
| Mihai Dascalu | 1 |
| Muhsin Menekse | 1 |
| Philippe Dessus | 1 |
| Rod D. Roscoe | 1 |
| Saira Anwar | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ishrat Ahmed; Wenxing Liu; Rod D. Roscoe; Elizabeth Reilley; Danielle S. McNamara – Grantee Submission, 2025
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being utilized to develop tools and services in various domains, including education. However, due to the nature of the training data, these models are susceptible to inherent social or cognitive biases, which can influence their outputs. Furthermore, their handling of critical topics, such as privacy…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Computer Mediated Communication, College Students
Saira Anwar; Ahmed Ashraf Butt; Muhsin Menekse – Grantee Submission, 2023
This study explored the effectiveness of scaffolding in students' reflection writing process. We compared two sections of an introductory computer programming course (N=188). In Section 1, students did not receive any scaffolding while generating reflections, whereas in Section 2, students were scaffolded during the reflection writing process.…
Descriptors: Scaffolding (Teaching Technique), Writing Instruction, Writing Processes, Writing (Composition)
Mihai Dascalu; Scott A. Crossley; Danielle S. McNamara; Philippe Dessus; Stefan Trausan-Matu – Grantee Submission, 2018
A critical task for tutors is to provide learners with suitable reading materials in terms of difficulty. The challenge of this endeavor is increased by students' individual variability and the multiple levels in which complexity can vary, thus arguing for the necessity of automated systems to support teachers. This chapter describes…
Descriptors: Reading Materials, Difficulty Level, Natural Language Processing, Artificial Intelligence
Allen, Laura K.; Snow, Erica L.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2015
This study builds upon previous work aimed at developing a student model of reading comprehension ability within the intelligent tutoring system, iSTART. Currently, the system evaluates students' self-explanation performance using a local, sentence-level algorithm and does not adapt content based on reading ability. The current study leverages…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Reading Skills, Natural Language Processing, Intelligent Tutoring Systems

Peer reviewed
Direct link
