Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 5 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 16 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 21 |
Descriptor
Knowledge Management | 21 |
Evidence Based Practice | 20 |
Foreign Countries | 13 |
Policy Formation | 6 |
Evidence | 5 |
Health Services | 5 |
Theory Practice Relationship | 5 |
Cooperation | 4 |
Models | 4 |
Research Utilization | 4 |
Researchers | 4 |
More ▼ |
Source
Evidence & Policy: A Journal… | 21 |
Author
Anthwal, Rachel | 2 |
Baxter, Helen | 2 |
Beckett, Kate | 2 |
Carey, Jude | 2 |
Cramer, Helen | 2 |
Davies, Huw | 2 |
Farr, Michelle | 2 |
Robinson, Rebecca | 2 |
Rooney, James | 2 |
Sharples, Jonathan | 2 |
Wye, Lesley | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 21 |
Reports - Research | 17 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
Canada | 4 |
United Kingdom | 4 |
United Kingdom (Scotland) | 2 |
Africa | 1 |
Europe | 1 |
New York (New York) | 1 |
South Africa | 1 |
United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
United Kingdom (London) | 1 |
United Kingdom (Wales) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Louise Shaxson; Rick Hood; Annette Boaz; Brian Head – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2025
Background: Knowledge brokering plays an important role in the evidence-to-policy system, but little is known about whether and how it occurs within government departments. Aims and objectives: Using empirical evidence from one UK government department, this article analyses how knowledge brokering takes place inside the policy making process and…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Public Policy, Policy Formation, Evidence
Harris, Janet; Springett, Jane; Mathews, Debbie; Weston, Guy; Foster, Alexis – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2022
Background: Devolution and integration of health and social care have placed increasing pressure on local statutory services, with a corresponding shift of health and social care to community organisations. The voluntary and charitable sector (VCS) is expected to make the case for increased funding by providing evidence of value and impact. Aims…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Evidence, Outcome Measures, Volunteers
MacKillop, Eleanor; Downe, James – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2023
Background: Government-funded knowledge brokering organisations (KBOs) are an increasingly prevalent yet under-researched area. Working in the space between knowledge and policy, yet framing themselves as different from think tanks and academic research centres, these organisations broker evidence into policy. Aims and objectives: This article…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Research Projects, Evidence, Policy Formation
Hannah Durrant; Rosie Havers; James Downe; Steve Martin – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2024
Background: While the rhetoric of evidence-based policymaking and practice is pervasive and persuasive, the extent to which either have been achieved is contested. Both require effective approaches to research-based knowledge mobilisation, particularly at the local level where context specificities undermine generic 'what works' claims. There has…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Evidence Based Practice, Knowledge Management, Information Dissemination
Gough, David; Maidment, Chris; Sharples, Jonathan – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2022
Target audience: What Works Centres; other intermediary brokerage agencies; their funders and users; and researchers of research use. Background: Knowledge brokerage and knowledge mobilisation (KM) are generic terms used to describe activities to enable the use of research evidence to inform policy, practice and individual decision making.…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Facilitators (Individuals), Evidence Based Practice, Decision Making
Wye, Lesley; Cramer, Helen; Beckett, Kate; Farr, Michelle; le May, Andrée; Carey, Jude; Robinson, Rebecca; Anthwal, Rachel; Rooney, James; Baxter, Helen – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2020
Background: The Bristol Knowledge Mobilisation (KM) Team was an unusual collective brokering model, consisting of a multi-professional team of four managers and three academics embedded in both local healthcare policymaking (aka commissioning) and academic primary care. Aims and objectives: They aimed to encourage 'research-informed commissioning'…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Evidence Based Practice, Health Services, Policy Formation
Reid, Garth; Connolly, John; Halliday, Wendy; Love, Anne-Marie; Higgins, Michael; MacGregor, Anita – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2017
Transferring knowledge into action is challenging. Ward et al. (2009a) developed a framework for bridging this gap. This article describes what helps and hinders getting knowledge into action when using this approach in the field of mental health. Four areas of Scotland were selected which had used resources to inform local planning and…
Descriptors: Barriers, Mental Health, Public Health, Influences
Matthews, Peter; Rutherfoord, Robert; Connelly, Steve; Richardson, Liz; Durose, Catherine; Vanderhoven, Dave – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2018
Research into the barriers of getting evidence produced by academics into policymaking processes has often highlighted the lack of research on academics and what they do, as compared to what policymakers do. This was most recently highlighted in a systematic review of the literature (Oliver et al, 2014). This paper reports on research carried out…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Communication (Thought Transfer), Knowledge Management, Universities
Wye, Lesley; Cramer, Helen; Carey, Jude; Anthwal, Rachel; Rooney, James; Robinson, Rebecca; Beckett, Kate; Farr, Michelle; le May, Andrée; Baxter, Helen – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2018
Aim: Policymaking decisions are often uninformed by research and research is rarely influenced by policymakers. To bridge this 'know-do' gap, a boundary-spanning knowledge mobilisation (KM) team was created by embedding researchers-in-residence and local policymakers into each other's organisations. Through increasing the two-way flow of knowledge…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Evidence Based Practice, Policy Formation, Researchers
Powell, Alison; Davies, Huw; Nutley, Sandra – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2017
Despite a burgeoning literature and the development of new theories about knowledge mobilisation in the past 15 years, findings from this online survey in 2014 of over 100 research agencies (n=106; response rate 57%) show the challenges of making effective use of formal and informal learning. Many agencies rely on traditional knowledge…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Theory Practice Relationship, Research Utilization, Informal Education
Sigurðardóttir, Anna Kristín; Morris, Andrew; Skoglund, Per; Tudjman, Tomislav – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2018
The purpose of this paper is to throw light on sustained research-practice collaborations (called 'schemes' here) aimed at improving educational outcomes. The empirical work combines a survey of thirteen school-university knowledge-exchange schemes in six European countries, with four case studies drawn from these. Three theoretical models of…
Descriptors: College School Cooperation, Partnerships in Education, Theory Practice Relationship, Knowledge Management
Holmes, Bev J.; Best, Allan; Davies, Huw; Hunter, David; Kelly, Michael P.; Marshall, Martin; Rycroft-Malone, Joanne – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2017
Worldwide, policymakers, health system managers, practitioners and researchers struggle to use evidence to improve policy and practice. There is growing recognition that this challenge relates to the complex systems in which we work. The corresponding increase in complexity-related discourse remains primarily at a theoretical level. This paper…
Descriptors: Health Programs, Health Services, Policy Formation, Praxis
Bruce, Ann; O'Callaghan, Kenneth – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2016
The evidence-policy interface is important for delivery of sustainable development policy. We examine one specific form of knowledge brokering, the temporary placement of academic research scientists in UK policy arenas. We argue that successful knowledge brokerage depends on establishing social processes critical to effective knowledge exchange.…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Evidence Based Practice, Policy Formation, Sustainable Development
Gradinger, Felix; Elston, Julian; Asthana, Sheena; Martin, Susan; Byng, Richard – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2018
Background/aims/objectives: 'Embedded' approaches to knowledge mobilisation are gaining currency, as health and social care services come under increasing pressure to redesign services now rather than wait for research. One such approach is the 'Researcher-in-Residence' (RiR) model which seeks to co-produce knowledge for action. The aim of this…
Descriptors: Action Research, Researchers, Outcome Measures, Knowledge Management
Brown, Chris; Rogers, Sue – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2015
This paper has two key aims. First, it examines the authors' attempts to use knowledge creation activity as a way of developing evidence-informed practice amongst a learning community of 36 early years practitioners in Camden, London. Second, it illustrates how the authors approached the idea of measuring evidence use and our engagement with two…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Evidence Based Practice, Knowledge Management, Communities of Practice
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2