Descriptor
Source
| Educational and Psychological… | 7 |
Author
| Kaiser, Henry F. | 2 |
| Cerny, Barbara A. | 1 |
| Frankiewicz, Ronald G. | 1 |
| Gondek, Paul C. | 1 |
| Karpman, Mitchell B. | 1 |
| Krus, David J. | 1 |
| Schnittjer, Carl J. | 1 |
| Showalter, Benjamin L. | 1 |
| Thompson, Bruce | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKaiser, Henry F. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Factor Analysis, Matrices, Multivariate Analysis
Peer reviewedSchnittjer, Carl J.; Showalter, Benjamin L. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
Designed to provide comparative analyses which could be employed as a basis for judicious program selection and use of generally available canonical correlation computer programs. (RC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs, Correlation, Multivariate Analysis
Peer reviewedKarpman, Mitchell B. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
This paper explains how a major statistical package (BMDP) can be used to produce partial, semipartial, or bipartial set correlation in terms of a procedure outlined by Karpman (1980). (BW)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Correlation, Mathematical Models, Multivariate Analysis
Peer reviewedKrus, David J.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
Description of a computer program performing rotated canonical variate analysis was presented. The program is compatible with the IBM Scientific Subroutines Package. Examples of rotated and unrotated solutions of a sample problem were given, together with their interpretations illustrating the advantages of the rotated solution. (Author)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Multivariate Analysis, Orthogonal Rotation, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewedGondek, Paul C. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
This paper discusses considerations in the unwary use of packaged discriminant analysis procedures including: the differences between the "group classification function" and the textbook classification function in both form and use, classification table confusions and their alleviation, and the hazards of stepping procedures. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Data Processing, Discriminant Analysis, Multivariate Analysis
Peer reviewedCerny, Barbara A.; Kaiser, Henry F. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
This note described a FORTRAN IV, CDC, computer program for the canonical analysis of a two-way contingency table. (Author)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Correlation, Multivariate Analysis, Nonparametric Statistics
Peer reviewedThompson, Bruce; Frankiewicz, Ronald G. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
An overview of several statistics useful in interpreting variates constructed by using canonical correlation analysis is presented. A computer program which calculates coefficients not typically provided by computer packages is discussed. An illustrative example of the output is provided. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Correlation, Multivariate Analysis, Program Descriptions


