Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Classification | 3 |
| Scores | 3 |
| Item Response Theory | 2 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| Licensing Examinations… | 1 |
| Mastery Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational and Psychological… | 3 |
Author
| Baldwin, Peter | 1 |
| Cahan, Sorel | 1 |
| Clauser, Jerome C. | 1 |
| Cohen, Nora | 1 |
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 1 |
| Liu, Ren | 1 |
| Luo, Xiao | 1 |
| Qian, Hong | 1 |
| Woo, Ada | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| United States Medical… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Liu, Ren; Qian, Hong; Luo, Xiao; Woo, Ada – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2018
Subscore reporting under item response theory models has always been a challenge partly because the test length of each subdomain is limited for precisely locating individuals on multiple continua. Diagnostic classification models (DCMs), providing a pass/fail decision and associated probability of pass on each subdomain, are promising…
Descriptors: Classification, Probability, Pass Fail Grading, Scores
Clauser, Jerome C.; Hambleton, Ronald K.; Baldwin, Peter – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2017
The Angoff standard setting method relies on content experts to review exam items and make judgments about the performance of the minimally proficient examinee. Unfortunately, at times content experts may have gaps in their understanding of specific exam content. These gaps are particularly likely to occur when the content domain is broad and/or…
Descriptors: Scores, Item Analysis, Classification, Decision Making
Peer reviewedCahan, Sorel; Cohen, Nora – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1990
A solution is offered to problems associated with the inequality in the manipulability of probabilities of classification errors of masters versus nonmasters, based on competency test results. Eschewing the typical arbitrary establishment of observed-score standards below 100 percent, the solution incorporates a self-correction of wrong answers.…
Descriptors: Classification, Error of Measurement, Mastery Tests, Minimum Competency Testing

Direct link
