Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Admission Criteria | 1 |
| Advocacy | 1 |
| Affirmative Action | 1 |
| Constitutional Law | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Educational Policy | 1 |
| Federal Courts | 1 |
| Geographic Location | 1 |
| Organizations (Groups) | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Policy | 1 |
Author
| Garces, Liliana M. | 1 |
| Horn, Catherine L. | 1 |
| Marin, Patricia | 1 |
| Miksch, Karen | 1 |
| Yun, John T. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Texas (Austin) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Fourteenth Amendment | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHorn, Catherine L.; Marin, Patricia; Garces, Liliana M.; Miksch, Karen; Yun, John T. – Educational Policy, 2020
Different from more traditional policy-making avenues, the courts provide an antipolitical arena that does not require broad agreement from various constituents for policy enactment. Seeking to guide court decisions on these policy issues, individuals and organizations have filed "amicus" briefs that increasingly include social science…
Descriptors: Educational Policy, Policy Formation, Court Litigation, Social Science Research
