Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cutting Scores | 8 |
| Testing Problems | 8 |
| Measurement Objectives | 5 |
| Test Use | 5 |
| Minimum Competency Testing | 4 |
| Psychometrics | 4 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 4 |
| Decision Making | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Educational Testing | 2 |
| Evaluators | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Measurement:… | 8 |
Author
| Mehrens, William A. | 2 |
| Fisher, Thomas H. | 1 |
| Geisinger, Kurt F. | 1 |
| Hein, Serge F. | 1 |
| Jaeger, Richard M. | 1 |
| Linn, Robert L. | 1 |
| Madaus, George F. | 1 |
| Skaggs, Gary | 1 |
| Wilkins, Jesse L. M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 8 |
| Opinion Papers | 5 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Skaggs, Gary; Hein, Serge F.; Wilkins, Jesse L. M. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
In test-centered standard-setting methods, borderline performance can be represented by many different profiles of strengths and weaknesses. As a result, asking panelists to estimate item or test performance for a hypothetical group study of borderline examinees, or a typical borderline examinee, may be an extremely difficult task and one that can…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Cutting Scores, Testing Problems, Profiles
Peer reviewedFisher, Thomas H. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1986
This reply to William A. Mehrens argues that although some psychometricians are reluctant to endorse the use of test data for educational decision making, it is desirable that measurement specialists provide decision makers with practical, understandable ways to use test data. (JAZ)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Decision Making, Educational Testing, Measurement Objectives
Peer reviewedGeisinger, Kurt F. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1991
Ways to use standard-setting data to adjust cutoff scores on examinations are reviewed. Ten sources of information to be used in determining standards are listed. The decision to modify passing scores should be based on these types of information and consideration of adverse impact or rating process irregularities. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators, Interrater Reliability
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1982
Confusion in the terminology used in criterion-referenced measurement specifications and development and standard setting and the attendant role of cut-off scores are shown to need practical clarification through psychometric research on test applications and consequences. (CM)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Measurement Objectives
Peer reviewedMehrens, William A. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1986
The Presidential Address at the 1986 National Council on Measurement in Education Annual Meeting argues that measurement specialists have tended to set unrealistic aspirations for the role tests play. The conjunctive decision making model is discussed and the use of data in the conjunctive and compensatory decision making models is examined. (JAZ)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Decision Making, Educational Testing, Measurement Objectives
Peer reviewedMadaus, George F. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1986
This reply to William A. Mehrens argues that test validity is the central issue in discussing the appropriate role of tests. It states that the procedures used to establish the validity of tests are inadequate because they depend primarily on content validity and not on construct and criterion validity. (JAZ)
Descriptors: Concurrent Validity, Construct Validity, Cutting Scores, Decision Making
Peer reviewedMehrens, William A. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1986
The President of the National Council on Measurement in Education replies to his critics. He argues that the concept of measurement error should not be used to make cut-scores more valid and that grade point averages have not been demonstrated to be valid indicators of teachers' subject matter competence. (LMO)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Grade Point Average, Licensing Examinations (Professions), Measurement Objectives
Peer reviewedJaeger, Richard M. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1991
Issues concerning the selection of judges for standard setting are discussed. Determining the consistency of judges' recommendations, or their congruity with other expert recommendations, would help in selection. Enough judges must be chosen to allow estimation of recommendations by an entire population of judges. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Examiners

Direct link
