Descriptor
| Test Selection | 4 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
| Achievement Tests | 2 |
| Tests | 2 |
| Affective Measures | 1 |
| Affective Objectives | 1 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Cognitive Tests | 1 |
| Committees | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Leadership | 4 |
Author
| Anderson, Jo Craig | 1 |
| Anderson, Lorin W. | 1 |
| Baker, Eva L. | 1 |
| Herman, Joan L. | 1 |
| Nielsen, Loretta A. | 1 |
| Whimbey, Arthur | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| New Jersey College Basic… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Herman, Joan L.; Baker, Eva L. – Educational Leadership, 2005
Many schools are moving to develop benchmark tests to monitor their students' progress toward state standards throughout the academic year. Benchmark tests can provide the ongoing information that schools need to guide instructional programs and to address student learning problems. The authors discuss six criteria that educators can use to…
Descriptors: Benchmarking, Tests, Student Evaluation, Test Selection
Peer reviewedNielsen, Loretta A.; And Others – Educational Leadership, 1982
Hillsborough (Florida) County Public Schools used a systematic process to choose a standardized test that matched its curriculum. (Author)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Committees, Curriculum, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedAnderson, Lorin W.; Anderson, Jo Craig – Educational Leadership, 1982
Presents information that teachers need when undertaking affective assessment: why such assessment should be done, what should be assessed, what instruments are available, how to determine the quality of the instrument, and how to interpret scores. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Affective Measures, Affective Objectives, Elementary Secondary Education, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewedWhimbey, Arthur – Educational Leadership, 1985
Research suggests that special tests of reasoning ability are superfluous. Reading comprehension and algebra scores on common aptitude and achievement tests are highly correlated with scores on several reasoning tests. Furthermore, three programs in reasoning skills have been shown to improve reading comprehension scores in various settings. (MCG)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Aptitude Tests, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Tests

Direct link
