Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
| Educational Leadership | 10 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 9 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 4 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
| California | 1 |
| North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKatims, Michael – Educational Leadership, 1979
Chicago's mastery learning program takes into account the complexities of reading and the realities of urban classrooms. Its designers say that if a program does not lead to success, it is not a mastery learning program. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedSirotnik, Kenneth A.; Oakes, Jeannie – Educational Leadership, 1981
Recommends that schools experiment with a comprehensive formative evaluation system suggested by "A Study of Schooling" by John Goodlad and his associates. The system includes periodic assessment of such things as student achievement, teaching practices, class climates, adult working environments, and parent attitudes. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Assessment, Educational Environment, Educational Quality
Peer reviewedConner, Katherine; And Others – Educational Leadership, 1985
Describes the Philadelphia Public Schools' formative testing program, used to diagnose students' difficulties under mastery learning, especially in mathematics. Discusses in turn the classroom, school, and district aspects of the program and summarizes the program's essential features. A full-page chart outlining aids and hindrances to formative…
Descriptors: Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Education, Formative Evaluation, Mastery Learning
Sato, Mistilina; Atkin, J. Myron – Educational Leadership, 2007
Formative assessment has been receiving increasing attention in education. But from a classroom teacher's perspective, changing assessment practices is not always an easy, straightforward process. This article describes the experiences of five middle schools science teachers who met together weekly to exchange ideas about integrating formative…
Descriptors: Science Teachers, Formative Evaluation, Student Evaluation, Teacher Improvement
Peer reviewedWare, William B.; And Others – Educational Leadership, 1973
The purpose of the present article is to react to the arguments presented in a booklet, Educational Accountability: Beyond Behavioral Objectives, that discusses the role of behavioral objectives. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Accountability, Behavioral Objectives, Cognitive Processes, Educational Objectives
Peer reviewedGlatthorn, Allan A.; Holler, Richard L. – Educational Leadership, 1987
Calvert County School District, Maryland, has developed a differentiated teacher evaluation system that promotes collaboration among supervisors and administrators in rating teacher performance. Methods involve informal observation, rating observation, and nonrating observation. Implementation is accompanied by extensive formative evaluation by…
Descriptors: Cooperative Planning, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedThorson, John R.; And Others – Educational Leadership, 1987
An instructional improvement program in Hinsdale School District, Illinois, succeeded by emphasizing formative evaluation, administrator evaluation, and long-range planning. Participants learned that a new program should be consistent with district goals, focus on staff development, and acquire top-level commitment and resources. (CJH)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Formative Evaluation, Instructional Improvement
Peer reviewedHoward, Barbara B.; McColskey, Wendy H. – Educational Leadership, 2001
Experienced teachers in North Carolina benefit from an evaluation system that sets clear expectations and combines traditional evaluation with individual growth opportunities. The model is based on a regional educational laboratory's 10 years of experience in research and development in formative evaluation. Teacher self-assessment is a key…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Expectation, Formative Evaluation, Professional Development
Peer reviewedSmith, B. Othanel – Educational Leadership, 1987
Based on research of teacher effectiveness, the Florida Performance Measurement System features formative and summative evaluation instruments comprised of wide-ranging concepts and indicators. Trained principals and supervisors observe and code behaviors for comparative evaluation. Florida districts and colleges make extensive use of the system…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Formative Evaluation, Performance Factors
Peer reviewedKimpston, Richard D.; And Others – Educational Leadership, 1984
Describes a method of monitoring the district curriculum during an extended maintenance period. The program audit for each subject area addresses the degree of fidelity to curriculum objectives, determines whether teachers are emphasizing the curriculum objectives, and identifies factors constraining curriculum implementation. (MJL)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation, Educational Administration, Educational Objectives

Direct link
