Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Active Learning | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Preferences | 2 |
| Student Attitudes | 2 |
| Teaching Methods | 2 |
| Age Groups | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Blended Learning | 1 |
| COVID-19 | 1 |
| Cognitive Style | 1 |
| Conventional Instruction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Education Sciences | 2 |
Author
| Aleksic, Ana | 1 |
| Muhammad, Nasim | 1 |
| Pološki Vokic, Nina | 1 |
| Ramos, Juan Antonio Lopez | 1 |
| Srinivasan, Seshasai | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Pološki Vokic, Nina; Aleksic, Ana – Education Sciences, 2020
Active teaching methods are emphasized as an important part of an effective teaching process for Generation Y students. Still, some individual characteristics, such as creativity and learning style, need to be considered as they can affect outcomes of the learning process. Empirical research on the students' preferences for various active and…
Descriptors: Active Learning, Teaching Methods, Age Groups, Cognitive Style
Srinivasan, Seshasai; Ramos, Juan Antonio Lopez; Muhammad, Nasim – Education Sciences, 2021
As they emerge from the pandemic, universities worldwide are evaluating the adaptations in the education sector during the pandemic and determining their course of action for the future. In this work, drawing on the lessons from four courses across two different universities, a survey of over 300 students, and the literature, we present strategies…
Descriptors: COVID-19, Pandemics, Higher Education, Program Implementation

Peer reviewed
