Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
| ELT Journal | 5 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Japan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kucuk, Funda; Walters, JoDee – ELT Journal, 2009
This article reports on a study of the validity and reliability of tests administered in an EFL university setting. The study addresses the question of how well face validity reflects more objective measures of the quality of a test, such as predictive validity and reliability. According to some researchers, face validity, defined as the surface…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Test Validity, Achievement Tests, English (Second Language)
Tomlinson, Brian – ELT Journal, 2005
This article advocates making the provision of opportunities for learning the main objective of language testing. It recognizes the need for tests to be fair, valid, and reliable, but asserts the priority of what it calls "learning validity", in order to prevent time being wasted on language courses on tests, and the preparation for them. The…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Testing, Language Tests, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewedBuck, Gary – ELT Journal, 1989
Examination of the reliability and validity of paper-and-pencil pronunciation tests of English as a second language in Osaka (Japan) showed very low reliability. Correlations with more direct measures of pronunciation showed very low validity of written pronunciation tests. Sample tests are appended. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Language Tests
Peer reviewedYule, George – ELT Journal, 1988
A Confidence-rating scale accompanying answers on a listening test helps distinguish between learners who select answers based on effective self-monitoring and those whose answers are based on poor self-monitoring. The latter are more likely to do so subsequently as well. Test items and a rating scale are illustrated. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Adults, Confidence Testing, English (Second Language), Error Analysis (Language)
Peer reviewedMatthews, Margaret – ELT Journal, 1990
Discusses problems with the current trend in using behavior trait-based criteria to assess English-as-a-Second-Language productivity skills, and describes alternatives to such testing that involve the matching of linguistic tasks against nonlinguistic criteria. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Communicative Competence (Languages), English (Second Language), Evaluation Criteria, Language Proficiency

Direct link
