Descriptor
Source
| Discourse Processes | 10 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 10 |
| Reports - Research | 9 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Greece | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedRumpelhart, Marilyn A. – Discourse Processes, 1983
Analyzes the interaction strategies employed by a conversational participant who is unsure that he or she understands the content or the context of the interaction well enough to contribute appropriately to it but feels impelled to continue participating anyway. (FL)
Descriptors: Adults, Communication Skills, Discourse Analysis, Interaction
Peer reviewedNewman, Denis; Bruce, Bertram C. – Discourse Processes, 1986
Uses an analysis of children's interpretations of a complex episode of social interaction to illustrate three features that distinguish them from robot plans and that form a basis for a theory of the development of social action: human plans (1) are social, (2) operate on interpretations, and (3) are used, not just executed. (FL)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Cognitive Processes, Comprehension, Discourse Analysis
Peer reviewedSidner, Candace L. – Discourse Processes, 1983
Discusses focusing, the manner in which speakers center attention on a particular element of discourse, and describes a process model of focusing that specifies what syntactic, semantic, and world knowledge constraints are needed for a hearer to track a speaker's focus in a discourse. (FL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Discourse Analysis, Interaction, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewedHoffmeister, Robert J.; Shettle, Carolyn – Discourse Processes, 1983
Examines whether, and how, deaf adults adjust their nonvocal communicative behavior when facing one of three audience types: hearing adults who have learned a signed language, deaf adults who use a signed languageand deaf children of deaf parents. (FL)
Descriptors: Adults, American Sign Language, Audience Analysis, Audiences
Peer reviewedGarvey, Catherine; Berniger, Ginger – Discourse Processes, 1981
Suggests that young children use their expectations of a context-specific, normal range of pause duration in timing the onset of a turn at speaking. (FL)
Descriptors: Child Language, Discourse Analysis, Early Childhood Education, Interaction
Peer reviewedWilbur, Ronnie B.; Petitto, Laura A. – Discourse Processes, 1983
Uses techniques of the study of conversational analysis in oral language in the study of American Sign Language conversations, and concludes that such conversations are structured in ways that parallel those of spoken language. (FL)
Descriptors: Adults, American Sign Language, Discourse Analysis, Interaction
Peer reviewedEisenberg, Ann R.; Garvey, Catherine – Discourse Processes, 1981
Reports the findings of a study that was designed to explore children's use of language in the adversative episode. (FL)
Descriptors: Conflict Resolution, Discourse Analysis, Early Childhood Education, Interaction
Peer reviewedTannen, Deborah – Discourse Processes, 1981
Examines social differences in expectations of indirectness in conversations between married couples, both Greek and Greek-American. Concludes that Greeks are more likely to expect indirectness in the context presented and that Greek-Americans have retained the Greek communicative patterns. (FL)
Descriptors: Adults, Communication Skills, Discourse Analysis, Ethnicity
Peer reviewedCorsaro, William A. – Discourse Processes, 1983
Suggests that children's use of social scripts for the production of sustained dialog in peer interaction depends on the nature of role play and that their attempts at script expansion are precursors to adults' recognition of the potential of conversation for self-expression. (FL)
Descriptors: Child Language, Discourse Analysis, Interaction, Language Acquisition
Peer reviewedAu, Kathryn Hu-Pei; Mason, Jane M. – Discourse Processes, 1983
Compares interactional rules in the lessons of a teacher who taught in a culturally congruent way and one who did not. Concludes that control over topic of discussion was maintained only by the teacher who used culturally congruent interactional patterns, and that the lessons of the other teacher were frequently sidetracked because of conflicts…
Descriptors: Classroom Communication, Classroom Techniques, Comparative Analysis, Cultural Differences


