Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Creativity | 2 |
| Testing | 2 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Databases | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Creativity Research Journal | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Taiwan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Zhao, Yanmei; Zhang, Zhengtang; Xu, Wenjian; Zhang, Qinglin – Creativity Research Journal, 2019
Although research from a range of fields indicates the importance of innovation for progress in those fields, there is not yet a set of best practices for promoting insights that lead to scientific innovation. This article proposes and tests the hypothesis that function-construction maps based on prototype and heuristic theory lead to increased…
Descriptors: Innovation, Scientific Research, Creativity, Best Practices
Lu, Chia-Chen; Luh, Ding-Bang – Creativity Research Journal, 2012
Although previous studies have attempted to use different experiences of raters to rate product creativity by adopting the Consensus Assessment Method (CAT) approach, the validity of replacing CAT with another measurement tool has not been adequately tested. This study aimed to compare raters with different levels of experience (expert ves.…
Descriptors: Creativity, Interrater Reliability, Construct Validity, Comparative Analysis

Peer reviewed
Direct link
