Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Science Education | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Cognitive Development | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Computer Science Education | 2 |
Author
| Gluga, Richard | 1 |
| Kay, Judy | 1 |
| Kleitman, Sabina | 1 |
| Kleitman, Simon | 1 |
| Lister, Raymond | 1 |
| Paul, Wolfgang | 1 |
| Vahrenhold, Jan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkVahrenhold, Jan; Paul, Wolfgang – Computer Science Education, 2014
We report on the development, validation, and implementation of a collection of test items designed to detect misconceptions related to first-year computer science courses. To this end, we reworked the development scheme proposed by Almstrum et al. ("SIGCSE Bulletin" 38(4):132-145, 2006) to include students' artifacts and to…
Descriptors: Computer Science Education, Introductory Courses, Test Items, Evaluation Methods
Gluga, Richard; Kay, Judy; Lister, Raymond; Kleitman, Simon; Kleitman, Sabina – Computer Science Education, 2013
To design an effective computer science curriculum, educators require a systematic method of classifying the difficulty level of learning activities and assessment tasks. This is important for curriculum design and implementation and for communication between educators. Different educators must be able to use the method consistently, so that…
Descriptors: Computer Science Education, Cognitive Development, Difficulty Level, Test Items
