Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Science Education | 2 |
| Reflection | 2 |
| Troubleshooting | 2 |
| Assignments | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Coding | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Computer Science Education | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| New Zealand | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Fatima Abu Deeb; Timothy Hickey – Computer Science Education, 2024
Background and Context: Auto-graders are praised by novice students learning to program, as they provide them with automatic feedback about their problem-solving process. However, some students often make random changes when they have errors in their code, without engaging in deliberate thinking about the cause of the error. Objective: To…
Descriptors: Reflection, Automation, Grading, Novices
Moskal, Adon Christian Michael; Wass, Rob – Computer Science Education, 2019
Background and Context: Encouraging undergraduate programming students to think more about their software development processes is challenging. Most programming courses focus on coding skill development and mastering programming language features; subsequently software development processes (e.g. planning, code commenting, and error debugging) are…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Undergraduate Students, Programming, Programming Languages

Peer reviewed
Direct link
