Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Coding | 2 |
| Computer Science Education | 2 |
| Grading | 2 |
| Automation | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Computer Science Education | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Fatima Abu Deeb; Timothy Hickey – Computer Science Education, 2024
Background and Context: Auto-graders are praised by novice students learning to program, as they provide them with automatic feedback about their problem-solving process. However, some students often make random changes when they have errors in their code, without engaging in deliberate thinking about the cause of the error. Objective: To…
Descriptors: Reflection, Automation, Grading, Novices
Nutbrown, Stephen; Higgins, Colin – Computer Science Education, 2016
This article explores the suitability of static analysis techniques based on the abstract syntax tree (AST) for the automated assessment of early/mid degree level programming. Focus is on fairness, timeliness and consistency of grades and feedback. Following investigation into manual marking practises, including a survey of markers, the assessment…
Descriptors: Programming, Grading, Evaluation Methods, Feedback (Response)

Peer reviewed
Direct link
