Descriptor
Source
| College and Research Libraries | 8 |
Author
| Murfin, Marjorie E. | 2 |
| Getz, Malcolm | 1 |
| Gugelchuk, Gary M. | 1 |
| Litchfield, Charles A. | 1 |
| Metoyer-Duran, Cheryl | 1 |
| Metz, Paul | 1 |
| Mitchell, Eugene S. | 1 |
| Mosborg, Stella Frank | 1 |
| Oberg, Larry R. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 8 |
| Reports - Research | 7 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedOberg, Larry R. – College and Research Libraries, 1988
Describes the conspectus collection evaluation process and its utility to smaller libraries, as demonstrated by the Library and Information Resources for the Northwest project. The discussion includes the costs of this method in staff time, the value of a completed conspectus, and problems with the methodology. (13 notes with references) (CLB)
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Data Analysis, Data Collection, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedMosborg, Stella Frank – College and Research Libraries, 1980
Reports a job analysis methodology to gather meaningful data related to circulation desk activity. The technique is designed to give librarians statistical data on actual time expenditures for complex and varying activities. (Author/RAA)
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Job Analysis, Library Administration, Library Circulation
Peer reviewedMurfin, Marjorie E. – College and Research Libraries, 1983
To develop method for determining adequacy of library reference desk staffing, data on reference transactions, person hours, percent of professional hours, and turnstile count for 1979 were obtained from 71 academic libraries and correlated with library performance measures. Formulas for predicting number of reference transactions and 17…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Correlation, Higher Education, Library Personnel
Peer reviewedMetz, Paul; Litchfield, Charles A. – College and Research Libraries, 1988
Examines data on circulation and in-house use of academic library collections to assess differences according to use, measurement technique, and time period. The discussion examines differences in current periodical use and other kinds of uses, differences between circulation and in-house use, and the reliability of short sampling periods. (13…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Higher Education
Peer reviewedGetz, Malcolm – College and Research Libraries, 1988
Describes a study that measured the benefits of an automated catalog and automated circulation system from the library user's point of view in terms of the value of time saved. Topics discussed include patterns of use, access time, availability of information, search behaviors, and the effectiveness of the measures used. (seven references)…
Descriptors: Access to Information, Cost Effectiveness, Library Automation, Library Circulation
Peer reviewedMitchell, Eugene S.; And Others – College and Research Libraries, 1994
Describes a study conducted in 1988 that investigated book availability in an academic library by providing a quantitative measure of library performance based on outcomes of card catalog searches and that can serve as a model for ongoing assessment in the library. Results are compared with earlier research from 1986. (Contains 12 references.)…
Descriptors: Card Catalogs, College Libraries, Comparative Analysis, Error Patterns
Peer reviewedMetoyer-Duran, Cheryl – College and Research Libraries, 1993
Describes a study that examined the readability of papers "College and Research Libraries" accepted, rejected, and published for 1990 and 1991. Results showing a statistically significant difference for the text of papers but not for abstracts are reported, and topics for further research are suggested. (Contains six references.) (EAM)
Descriptors: Abstracts, Academic Libraries, Difficulty Level, Higher Education
Peer reviewedMurfin, Marjorie E.; Gugelchuk, Gary M. – College and Research Libraries, 1987
Describes an instrument designed to assess the reference outcome in terms of patron report of success in finding what was wanted, rather than overall satisfaction. The results of a library survey which tested the reliability of this instrument and compared it with unobtrusive observation are reported. (Author/CLB)
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Library Research


