Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Advanced Placement Programs | 5 |
| Test Validity | 5 |
| Test Construction | 4 |
| Test Items | 4 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 3 |
| Psychometrics | 3 |
| Test Reliability | 3 |
| Achievement Tests | 2 |
| High School Students | 2 |
| Science Tests | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| College Board | 5 |
Author
| Hendrickson, Amy | 2 |
| Kaliski, Pamela | 2 |
| Patterson, Brian | 2 |
| Reshetar, Rosemary | 2 |
| Chajewski, Michael | 1 |
| Ewing, Maureen | 1 |
| France, Megan | 1 |
| Huff, Kristen | 1 |
| Lionberger, Karen | 1 |
| Melican, Gerald | 1 |
| Melican, Gerald J. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Non-Print Media | 3 |
| Reference Materials - General | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Advanced Placement… | 3 |
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Reshetar, Rosemary; Kaliski, Pamela; Chajewski, Michael; Lionberger, Karen – College Board, 2012
This presentation summarizes a pilot study conducted after the May 2011 administration of the AP Environmental Science Exam. The study used analytical methods based on scaled anchoring as input to a Performance Level Descriptor validation process that solicited systematic input from subject matter experts.
Descriptors: Advanced Placement Programs, Science Tests, Achievement Tests, Classification
Kaliski, Pamela; France, Megan; Huff, Kristen; Thurber, Allison – College Board, 2011
Developing a cognitive model of task performance is an important and often overlooked phase in assessment design; failing to establish such a model can threaten the validity of the inferences made from the scores produced by an assessment (e.g., Leighton, 2004). Conducting think aloud interviews (TAIs), where students think aloud while completing…
Descriptors: World History, Advanced Placement Programs, Achievement Tests, Protocol Analysis
Reshetar, Rosemary; Melican, Gerald J. – College Board, 2010
This paper discusses issues related to the design and psychometric work for mixed-format tests --tests containing both multiple-choice (MC) and constructed-response (CR) items. The issues of validity, fairness, reliability and score consistency can be addressed but for mixed-format tests there are many decisions to be made and no examination or…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Test Construction, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Items
Hendrickson, Amy; Patterson, Brian; Ewing, Maureen – College Board, 2010
The psychometric considerations and challenges associated with including constructed response items on tests are discussed along with how these issues affect the form assembly specifications for mixed-format exams. Reliability and validity, security and fairness, pretesting, content and skills coverage, test length and timing, weights, statistical…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Test Format, Test Construction, Test Validity
Hendrickson, Amy; Patterson, Brian; Melican, Gerald – College Board, 2008
Presented at the Annual National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) in New York in March 2008. This presentation explores how different item weighting can affect the effective weights, validity coefficents and test reliability of composite scores among test takers.
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Test Format, Test Validity, Test Reliability


