Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| Intelligence | 2 |
| Behavior | 1 |
| Causal Models | 1 |
| Cognitive Science | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Intelligence Tests | 1 |
| Language Processing | 1 |
| Perception | 1 |
| Value Judgment | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognitive Science | 2 |
Author
| Chater, Nick | 1 |
| Cowan, William | 1 |
| Kryven, Marta | 1 |
| Oaksford, Mike | 1 |
| Tenenbaum, Joshua B. | 1 |
| Ullman, Tomer D. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kryven, Marta; Ullman, Tomer D.; Cowan, William; Tenenbaum, Joshua B. – Cognitive Science, 2021
Humans routinely make inferences about both the contents and the workings of other minds based on observed actions. People consider what others want or know, but also how intelligent, rational, or attentive they might be. Here, we introduce a new methodology for quantitatively studying the mechanisms people use to attribute intelligence to others…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Cognitive Processes, Behavior, Value Judgment
Chater, Nick; Oaksford, Mike – Cognitive Science, 2013
Judea Pearl has argued that counterfactuals and causality are central to intelligence, whether natural or artificial, and has helped create a rich mathematical and computational framework for formally analyzing causality. Here, we draw out connections between these notions and various current issues in cognitive science, including the nature of…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Intelligence, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Science

Peer reviewed
Direct link
