Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Abstract Reasoning | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Context Effect | 1 |
| Credibility | 1 |
| Cultural Differences | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Differences | 1 |
| Epistemology | 1 |
| Ethnic Groups | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognitive Science | 3 |
Author
| Homaei, Hadjar | 1 |
| Medin, Douglas L. | 1 |
| Mozer, Michael C. | 1 |
| Pashler, Harold | 1 |
| Unsworth, Sara J. | 1 |
| Wiemer-Hastings, Katja Katja | 1 |
| Xu, Xu | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| South Korea | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mozer, Michael C.; Pashler, Harold; Homaei, Hadjar – Cognitive Science, 2008
Griffiths and Tenenbaum (2006) asked individuals to make predictions about the duration or extent of everyday events (e.g., cake baking times), and reported that predictions were optimal, employing Bayesian inference based on veridical prior distributions. Although the predictions conformed strikingly to statistics of the world, they reflect…
Descriptors: Models, Individual Activities, Group Activities, Prediction
Wiemer-Hastings, Katja Katja; Xu, Xu – Cognitive Science, 2005
Concept properties are an integral part of theories of conceptual representation and processing. To date, little is known about conceptual properties of abstract concepts, such as idea. This experiment systematically compared the content of 18 abstract and 18 concrete concepts, using a feature generation task. Thirty-one participants listed…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Concept Formation, Abstract Reasoning, Context Effect
Unsworth, Sara J.; Medin, Douglas L. – Cognitive Science, 2005
Norenzayan, Smith, Jun Kim, and Nisbett (2002) investigated cultural differences in the use of intuitive versus formal reasoning in 4 experiments. Our comment concerns the 4th experiment where Norenzayan et al. reported that, although there were no cultural differences in accuracy on abstract logical arguments, Koreans made more errors than U.S.…
Descriptors: Logical Thinking, Experiments, Cultural Differences, Persuasive Discourse

Peer reviewed
Direct link
