Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Task Analysis | 3 |
| Cognitive Ability | 2 |
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| Conflict | 2 |
| Auditory Stimuli | 1 |
| Behavior | 1 |
| Cognitive Development | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognition | 3 |
Author
| Notebaert, Wim | 3 |
| Verguts, Tom | 3 |
| Braem, Senne | 1 |
| Fias, Wim | 1 |
| Gevers, Wim | 1 |
| Houtman, Femke | 1 |
| Roggeman, Chantal | 1 |
| Van Opstal, Filip | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Braem, Senne; Verguts, Tom; Roggeman, Chantal; Notebaert, Wim – Cognition, 2012
Both cognitive conflict (e.g. Verguts & Notebaert, 2009) and reward signals (e.g. Waszak & Pholulamdeth, 2009) have been proposed to enhance task-relevant associations. Bringing these two notions together, we predicted that reward modulates conflict-based sequential adaptations in cognitive control. This was tested combining either a single…
Descriptors: Conflict, Rewards, Cognitive Processes, Correlation
Notebaert, Wim; Houtman, Femke; Van Opstal, Filip; Gevers, Wim; Fias, Wim; Verguts, Tom – Cognition, 2009
It is generally assumed that slowing after errors is a cognitive control effect reflecting more careful response strategies after errors. However, clinical data are not compatible with this explanation. We therefore consider two alternative explanations, one referring to the possibility of a persisting underlying problem and one on the basis of…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Research Methodology, Preschool Children, Cognitive Development
Notebaert, Wim; Verguts, Tom – Cognition, 2008
Cognitive control adjusts information processing to momentary needs and task requirements. We investigated conflict adaptation when participants are performing two tasks, a Simon task and a SNARC task. The results indicated that one congruency effect (e.g., Simon) was reduced after conflict in the other task (e.g., SNARC), but only when both tasks…
Descriptors: Conflict, Cognitive Processes, Information Processing, Task Analysis

Peer reviewed
Direct link
