Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 2 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 10 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 18 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 33 |
Descriptor
Source
| Child Development | 114 |
Author
| Maratsos, Michael P. | 5 |
| Gelman, Susan A. | 3 |
| Hall, D. Geoffrey | 3 |
| Waxman, Sandra R. | 3 |
| Ackerman, Brian P. | 2 |
| Baldwin, Dare A. | 2 |
| Fisher, Anna V. | 2 |
| Graham, Susan A. | 2 |
| Rosinski, Richard R. | 2 |
| Smith, Linda B. | 2 |
| Unger, Layla | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 85 |
| Reports - Research | 76 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 4 |
| Elementary Education | 3 |
| Preschool Education | 3 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 10 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMiscione, John L.; And Others – Child Development, 1978
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Comprehension, Fundamental Concepts, Intellectual Development
Peer reviewedDouglas, Joan Delahanty; Corsale, Kathleen – Child Development, 1977
The release-from-proactive-inhibition technique was used to assess the effects of mode of presentation and presentation rate on the development of elementary school children's ability to use the evaluative dimension of the Semantic Differential as an encoding device in short-term memory. (Author/JMB)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Inhibition, Learning Modalities, Memory
Peer reviewedMacnamara, John; And Others – Child Development, 1976
This study examined the ability of 4-year-old children to understand the propositional components (presuppositions and assertions) of semantically complex propositions and to deduce what such components together imply. (BRT)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Language Acquisition, Logical Thinking, Preschool Children
Peer reviewedRavn, Karen E.; Gelman, Susan A. – Child Development, 1984
Examined five possible rules that children might use to interpret the terms "big" and "little." Increasing consistency in rule usage appeared to be the most significant developmental progression for children between the ages of three and five with respect to these terms. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Error Patterns, Language Acquisition, Preschool Children
Peer reviewedBushnell, Emily W.; Maratsos, Michael P. – Child Development, 1984
Abilities of 2-, 5-, and 7-year-old children to interpret, judge acceptability of, and produce class extensions were assessed. It was concluded that increasing ability to deal appropriately with class extensions is primarily due to general advances in language acquisition rather than to any development unique to the class-extension word-formation…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Comprehension, Infants, Language Research
Peer reviewedBohannon, John Neil, III; And Others – Child Development, 1984
Reports two studies which found a relationship between awareness of word order in sentences and reading readiness and achievement for children in kindergarten through third grade. Suggests this type of metalinguistic awareness may be important to early reading because it helps children to detect meaningful relationships between words. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Children, Longitudinal Studies, Reading Achievement, Reading Readiness
Peer reviewedKareev, Yaakov – Child Development, 1982
Tests the hypothesis that semantic memory changes with age such that concepts become more strongly associated with their superordinate classes than with their exemplars. The Stroop color-naming technique was employed with 48 children 8 through 12 years of age to measure the degree of semantic activation between concepts in memory. (Author)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Association (Psychology), Children, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewedMoore, Chris; And Others – Child Development, 1989
Examines the understanding of the pragmatic function of mental terms ("think,""know,""guess") to express the relative certainty of 69 children aged 3-11. Results showed an improvement with age for the "know-think" and "know-guess" contrasts, but no improvement with age for the…
Descriptors: Child Language, Children, Foreign Countries, Language Acquisition
Peer reviewedTaylor, Marjorie; Gelman, Susan A. – Child Development, 1989
Results of four experiments suggest that two-year-olds may be capable of forming inclusion relations when they hear a novel word for an object that already has a familiar name. (PCB)
Descriptors: Child Language, Cognitive Processes, Language Acquisition, Language Patterns
Peer reviewedMaratsos, Michael P. – Child Development, 1974
Preschool children were tested for their understanding of the use of definite and indefinite articles in 2 kinds of story-telling tasks. (ST)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Language Acquisition, Listening Comprehension
Peer reviewedJohnson, Carl Nils; Maratsos, Michael P. – Child Development, 1977
Examines preschool children's comprehension of the differing implications of the verbs "think" and "know". Results indicated that 4-year-olds, but not 3-year-olds, understood the differences between the terms. (JMB)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Child Language, Preschool Children
Peer reviewedEhri, Linnea C. – Child Development, 1977
Third- and sixth-grade readers were asked to label sets of pictures printed with distracting words (either nouns, adjectives, or functors) and nonsense syllables. (Author/JMB)
Descriptors: Adjectives, Elementary Education, Function Words, Interference (Language)
Peer reviewedBates, Elizabeth; And Others – Child Development, 1984
Compares sentence interpretation in American and Italian children between the ages of two and five. Results indicated that Italian children relied primarily on semantic cues, whereas American children relied on word order. (Author/CI)
Descriptors: Cross Cultural Studies, Cues, Interpretive Skills, Preschool Children
Peer reviewedTager-Flusberg, Helen – Child Development, 1985
Findings suggest that semantic knowledge for concrete objects is represented and organized in similar ways in autistic, retarded, and normal children. Previous findings on cognitive deficits in autistic children are more likely related to their inability to use cognitive representations in an appropriate and flexible manner. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Autism, Classification, Cognitive Ability, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedBlank, Marion; Frank, Sheldon M. – Child Development, 1971
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Intelligence, Kindergarten Children, Linguistic Performance


