Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Abstract Reasoning | 3 |
| Inferences | 3 |
| Age Differences | 2 |
| Cognitive Development | 2 |
| Logical Thinking | 2 |
| Analogy | 1 |
| Causal Models | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Cognitive Structures | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Child Development | 3 |
Author
| Franks, Bridget A. | 1 |
| Goddu, Mariel K. | 1 |
| Goswami, Usha | 1 |
| Moshman, David | 1 |
| Sullivan, J. Nicholas | 1 |
| Walker, Caren M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| United Kingdom (Cambridge) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Goddu, Mariel K.; Sullivan, J. Nicholas; Walker, Caren M. – Child Development, 2021
The ability to consider multiple possibilities forms the basis for a wide variety of human-unique cognitive capacities. When does this skill develop? Previous studies have narrowly focused on children's ability to prepare for incompatible future outcomes. Here, we investigate this capacity in a causal learning context. Adults (N = 109) and 18- to…
Descriptors: Toddlers, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Development, Causal Models
Peer reviewedGoswami, Usha – Child Development, 1991
Children's analogical reasoning has traditionally been measured by classical four-term analogy tasks or problem-solving tasks. Current theories of analogical development and the evidence on which they are based are reviewed. It is concluded that structural views of analogical development are wrong, and knowledge-based accounts of what develops are…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Analogy, Children
Peer reviewedMoshman, David; Franks, Bridget A. – Child Development, 1986
Tested hypothesis that understanding validity of inference is a relatively late development by asking fourth and seventh graders and college students to sort sets of deductive arguments. None of fourth graders, 45 percent of seventh graders, and 85 percent of college students used validity as basis for distinguishing arguments. Experiments…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, College Students, Deduction

Direct link
