Descriptor
| Incidental Learning | 13 |
| Age Differences | 9 |
| Elementary School Students | 9 |
| Attention | 6 |
| Memory | 5 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 4 |
| Cognitive Development | 3 |
| Learning | 3 |
| Research | 3 |
| Cognitive Ability | 2 |
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Child Development | 13 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 5 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedCollins, W. Andrew – Child Development, 1970
Suggests an increase with age in children's ability to focus on essential content from a media presentation. Children in early adolescence seemed better able than younger ones to ignore nonessential information. (WY)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Age Differences, Cognitive Processes, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedHenek, Tomacine; Miller, Leon K. – Child Development, 1976
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Elementary School Students, Incidental Learning
Peer reviewedHawkins, Robert P. – Child Development, 1973
Study demonstrates that the curvilinear relation between age and peripheral learning from films may not be so general a phenomenon as it appeared from previous research. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention, Childhood Interests, Content Analysis
Peer reviewedRoss, Dorothea – Child Development, 1970
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Incidental Learning, Learning, Mild Mental Retardation
Peer reviewedMiller, Patricia H.; Weiss, Michael G. – Child Development, 1982
The purpose of this research was to examine developmental changes in the knowledge about what variables affect performance on the incidental learning task. Kindergarteners, second graders, fifth graders, and college students indicated on a rating scale how many animals a hypothetical person would remember under easy and difficult levels of each…
Descriptors: Adults, Attention, Children, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewedSabo, Ruth A.; Hagen, John W. – Child Development, 1973
Study was designed to investigate the effects of color cues and of subject-employed strategies in the development of selective attention in a short-term memory task. (Authors)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention, Color, Cues
Peer reviewedMiller, Patricia H.; Weiss, Michael G. – Child Development, 1981
Strategies of allocating attention to information and incidental learning task performance were assessed among 60 children from grades 2, 5, and 8. Children's predictions about their recall of incidental objects and answers to a posttest questionnaire provided verbal measures of their understanding of attention. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedDusek, Jerome B.; And Others – Child Development, 1976
The incidental and intentional learning abilities of high- and low-test-anxious second, fourth, and sixth grade children were explored. (BRT)
Descriptors: Anxiety, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedKeniston, Allen H.; Flavell, John H. – Child Development, 1979
Among elementary, junior high, and college students, intelligent retrieval methods for recalling 20 letters of the alphabet consisted either of mentally proceeding through the alphabet from the onset and writing down each previously written letter as encountered and recognized, or else first rote recalling some letters and then switching to the…
Descriptors: Age Differences, College Students, Elementary School Students, Incidental Learning
Peer reviewedSiegel, Alexander W.; Van Cara, Flo – Child Development, 1971
Descriptors: Age Differences, Data Analysis, Elementary School Students, Incidental Learning
Peer reviewedPelham, William E. – Child Development, 1979
Results as a whole did not support the hypothesis that poor readers show deficits in selective attention relative to age-matched normal readers. (RH)
Descriptors: Attention, Auditory Perception, Classification, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewedWheeler, Richard J.; Dusek, Jerome B. – Child Development, 1973
Study is an investigation of the effects of an attention-focusing variable--spatial separation of central and incidental cues--and a cognitive strategy factor--verbal labeling of central cues--and their interaction on the incidental learning of Ss younger than those previously tested with these manipulations. (Authors)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention, Cognitive Ability, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedAzmitia, Margarita; And Others – Child Development, 1987
To examine selective memorization in a scene context in which the expectancy of items was manipulated, preschool children, young adults, and older adults viewed a series of familiar scenes and were asked to remember one item from each. Results for children contrasted with the typical result of selective memorization research. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Ability, Expectation, Incidental Learning


