NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Friedman, William J.; Lyon, Thomas D. – Child Development, 2005
In a study of the ability to reconstruct the times of past events, 86 children from 4 to 13 years recalled the times of 2 in-class demonstrations that had occurred 3 months earlier and judged the times of hypothetical events. Many of the abilities needed to reconstruct the times of events were present by 6 years, including the capacity to…
Descriptors: Cues, Children, Age Differences, Time Perspective
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Friedman, William J. – Child Development, 1991
In this study of the distinction between temporal distance and location, children were asked to judge the relative recency and time of target events that occurred one and seven weeks before testing. All judged recency and localized time of day correctly. Six- and eight- but not four-year olds localized longer time scales. (BC)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cues, Individual Development, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bullock, Merry; Gelman, Rochel – Child Development, 1979
Indicates that preschool-aged children can and do rely on temporal ordering as a cue in making a causal judgment about a simple, mechanical event. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Attribution Theory, Cues, Fundamental Concepts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Friedman, William J.; And Others – Child Development, 1995
Examined developmental changes in the use of distance-based and calendar-based approaches to estimate the recency of two events. Found that children's ability to discriminate temporal relationships between two events appears by four to five years of age. In contrast, use of calendar information and cognizance of annual patterns was found only in…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Concept Formation, Cues