NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wormith, S. J.; And Others – Child Development, 1975
Investigated the possibility that evidence of frequency discrimination might be found when the experimental procedures involved the conjugate reinforcement of nonnutritive sucking. (SDH)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Cognitive Development, Discrimination Learning, Infant Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fuller, Peter W.; And Others – Child Development, 1981
Determines whether an averaged evoked potential technique using a random-v-repetitive presentation mode could be used to study infant auditory discrimination. Results showed a main effect of presentation mode with shorter latency for random v repetitive. The shortest onset latency was for random stimulus at the fast rate. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Attention Span, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Auditory Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Davis, Sylvia M.; McCroskey, Robert L. – Child Development, 1980
Focuses on auditory fusion (defined in terms of a listerner's ability to distinguish paired acoustic events from single acoustic events) in 3- to 12-year-old children. The subjects listened to 270 pairs of tones controlled for frequency, intensity, and duration. (CM)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Tests, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Trehub, Sandra E.; And Others – Child Development, 1984
Two experiments involving a total of 177 infants 8 to 11 months of age found that subjects used a global processing strategy like adults' in discriminating transformations of a six-tone melody. Subjects needed melodic contour and frequency range to judge new sequences, but, in easy tasks, they also used absolute frequency. (CB)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Discrimination Learning, Infants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Elliott, Lois L.; And Others – Child Development, 1986
Examines whether age-related differences would be observed between young children and adults for discrimination of synthesized, five-format consonant-vowel syllables that differed in voicing onset time of the initial consonants. (HOD)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kamil, Michael L.; Rudegeair, Robert E. – Child Development, 1972
Two major implications of this study are that repeated testing is a necessity for young children, and that repeated contrasts may provide a more accurate assessment of phonological discrimination ability in children. (Authors/MB)
Descriptors: Acoustic Phonetics, Auditory Discrimination, Data Analysis, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lewkowicz, David J. – Child Development, 2000
Three experiments investigated 4-, 6-, and 8-month-olds' perception of the audible, visible, and combined attributes of bimodally specified syllables. Results suggested that at 4 months, infants attended primarily to the featural information, at 6 months primarily to the asynchrony, and at 8 months to both features independently. (Author/KB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception