NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 21 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alexis S. Smith-Flores; Gabriel J. Bonamy; Lindsey J. Powell – Child Development, 2025
Children's evaluations of empathizers were examined using vignette-based tasks (N = 159 4- to 7-year-old U.S. children, 82 girls, 52% White) between March 2023 and March 2024. Children typically evaluated empathizers positively compared to less empathic others. They rated empathic responses as more appropriate, selected empathizers as nicer, and…
Descriptors: Childrens Attitudes, Evaluative Thinking, Empathy, Young Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nicolette Granata; Chyna Bacchus; Melanie Leguizamon; Jonathan D. Lane – Child Development, 2025
Children with disabilities often receive accommodations, but teachers rarely explain them to typically-developing (TD) classmates. How do TD students reason about these accommodations and evaluate their fairness? Five-, seven-, and nine-year-olds from the United States (N = 122; 50% female; 87.7% white; data collected April 2022-September 2023)…
Descriptors: Childrens Attitudes, Academic Accommodations (Disabilities), Students with Disabilities, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Woolley, Jacqueline D.; Nissel, Jenny; Gilpin, Ansley T. – Child Development, 2021
Verbal testimony about reality status is critical but often contradictory. These studies address whom children consider reliable sources of information about reality and how they evaluate conflicting testimony. In Study 1, seventy 4- to 8-year-olds heard an adult or child provide testimony about how to cook food and use toys, and about the reality…
Descriptors: Young Children, Childrens Attitudes, Information Sources, Evaluative Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhao, Wanlin; Li, Baike; Shanks, David R.; Zhao, Wenbo; Zheng, Jun; Hu, Xiao; Su, Ningxin; Fan, Tian; Yin, Yue; Luo, Liang; Yang, Chunliang – Child Development, 2022
Recent studies established that making concurrent judgments of learning (JOLs) can significantly alter (typically enhance) memory itself--a "reactivity" effect. The current study recruited 190 Chinese children (M[subscript age] = 8.68 years; 101 female) in 2020 and 2021 to explore the reactivity effect on children's learning, its…
Descriptors: Evaluative Thinking, Memory, Metacognition, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Köymen, Bahar; O'Madagain, Cathal; Domberg, Andreas; Tomasello, Michael – Child Development, 2020
In collaborative problem solving, children produce and evaluate arguments for proposals. We investigated whether 3- and 5-year-olds (N = 192) can produce and evaluate arguments against those arguments (i.e., counter-arguments). In Study 1, each child within a peer dyad was privately given a reason to prefer one over another solution to a task. One…
Descriptors: Young Children, Persuasive Discourse, Evaluative Thinking, Problem Solving
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Smetana, Judith G.; Wong, Mun; Ball, Courtney; Yau, Jenny – Child Development, 2014
A total of 267 five-, seven-, and ten-year-olds (M = 7.62), 147 in Hong Kong and 120 in the United States, evaluated hypothetical personal (and moral) events described as either essential or peripheral to actors' identity. Except for young Chinese in the peripheral condition, straightforward personal events were overwhelmingly evaluated as…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Children, Self Concept, Compliance (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lagattuta, Kristin Hansen; Sayfan, Liat – Child Development, 2013
Four- to 10-year-olds and adults (N = 265) responded to eight scenarios presented on an eye tracker. Each trial involved a character who encounters a perpetrator who had previously enacted positive (P), negative (N), or both types of actions toward him or her in varying sequences (NN, PP, PN, and NP). Participants predicted the character's…
Descriptors: Children, Adults, Bias, Attention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Heyman, Gail D.; Fu, Genyue; Lee, Kang – Child Development, 2007
The way in which children evaluate people's claims about their own psychological characteristics was examined. Among children ages 6-11 from the United States and China (total N = 243), there was an age-related increase in skepticism about self-report concerning the highly value-laden characteristics "honest", "smart", and…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Children, Psychological Characteristics, Self Disclosure (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nicholls, John G.; Miller, Arden T. – Child Development, 1984
Compares second-, fifth- and eighth-graders' reasoning about their relative ability and that of another child (who applied more or less effort) with their reasoning about the relative ability of two others (who differed in effort). Responses to specific questions may be more sensitive to situationally induced motivational influences than responses…
Descriptors: Ability, Age Differences, Children, Evaluative Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gelman, Susan A.; Ebeling, Karen S. – Child Development, 1989
Examines the ability of 140 children of 3-5 years to use functional standards to judge size. The ability to use nonegocentric functional standards was present by age 3. However, 3-year-olds performed above chance only when their attention was directed to the relevant function. (RJC)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Egocentrism, Evaluative Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Alvarez, Jeannette M.; Ruble, Diane N.; Bolger, Niall – Child Development, 2001
Tested the hypothesis that in predicting future behavior of an actor, older children rely on trait inferences, whereas younger children rely on global, evaluative inferences. Found that 9- and 10-year-olds' behavioral predictions were mediated solely by trait ratings, whereas 5- and 6-year-olds' predictions were mediated by evaluative ratings. The…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Child Behavior, Children, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smetana, Judith G. – Child Development, 1981
Examined preschool children's conceptions of moral and conventional rules. Children judged the seriousness, rule contingency, rule relativism, and amount of deserved punishment for 10 depicted moral and conventional preschool transgressions. Constant across ages and sexes, children evaluated moral transgressions as more serious offenses and more…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Evaluative Thinking, Moral Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bussey, Kay – Child Development, 1999
Investigated 4-, 8-, and 11-year-olds' ability to categorize intentionally false and true statements as lies and truths. Found that older children were more likely to categorize false statements as lies and true statements as truths than were 4-year-olds. Antisocial lies were rated as most serious, and "white lies" as least serious.…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Classification, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Helwig, Charles C.; And Others – Child Development, 1995
Seventy-two children were presented with a series of stories involving psychological harm in a game context. Found that older children were more likely than younger ones to base their evaluations on intentions, or both intentions and consequences, and to take into account the recipient's perspective. Game context interacted differentially with…
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Age Differences, Childrens Games, Emotional Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Laupa, Marta; Turiel, Elliot – Child Development, 1986
Examines elementary school children's concept of authority with regard to the age and social position of command-giver and the type of command given. Shows that children's evaluation of adult and peer authority were based on a combination of age and position in the social context. (HOD)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Concept Formation, Elementary School Students
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2