NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Fleit, Linda; Whiteside, Richard – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1985
A tongue-in-cheek, point/counterpoint discussion between a user and a computer professional is presented. Personal computing, it is suggested, can help strike a balance between what users can do for themselves to gain control and responsibility and what computer professionals can do to support that. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Centralization, Data Processing, Decentralization, Guidelines
Klingenstein, Kenneth; Devine, Gary D. – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1985
University administrative data processing is moving toward a more distributed environment. An architecture must be established that incorporates central sites, campus centers, and end users in a networked pool of computer systems, with applications located at appropriate nodes in the network. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Centralization, College Administration, Computer Software, Computers
Carson, Eugene – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1987
Administrators, faculty, and staff should have electronic access to records needed to perform their jobs, and students should have access to their own records--course registration and addresses. User-directed analysis and reporting are discussed and the security and audit issues are examined. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Access to Information, Centralization, College Administration, Data Analysis
Gleason, William; Moldovan, John – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1987
The process and experiences associated with strategic planning in a recently decentralized administrative information systems environment are described. Background information on why Virginia Commonwealth University decentralized the authority, responsibility, and accountability for the delivery of administrative information services to major…
Descriptors: Accountability, Centralization, College Administration, Data Processing
CAUSE/EFFECT, 1983
The computing and information systems at the University of Missouri are described. All computing activity was centralized beginning in 1973 with the formation of the university computer network. Administrative data processing, financial systems, student systems, and office automation are discussed. (MLW)
Descriptors: Centralization, College Administration, Computers, Data Processing
Heydinger, Richard B.; Norris, Donald M. – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1979
Arguments for and against decentralization of data management, analysis, and planning systems are presented. It is suggested that technological advances have encouraged decentralization. Caution in this direction is urged and the development of an articulated decentralization program is proposed. (SF)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Centralization, Change Strategies, College Planning
Gustavson, Patricia – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1983
A sociotechnical systems model used by John Brown University is described that is useful for analyzing the complexities of change in an organization and for describing the many elements involved in change. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Centralization, Change Strategies, College Administration, Data Processing
Seim, Sandra K.; Stoneking, Cheryl A. – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1981
In February 1980, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Lukes Medical Center in Chicago appointed a task force to study word processing/office automation and to make recommendations for acquisition, implementation, and administration. The group's working approach, findings, and conclusions are discussed. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Automation, Centralization, Coordination, Data Processing
Richey, R. Wayne – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1979
The feasibility of replacing existing central processing units with a single computer facility is discussed. An analysis of the computing facilities for the Iowa state universities is presented and supports the retention of decentralized facilities. Efficiency, costs, and operating considerations are examined. (SF)
Descriptors: Centralization, Comparative Analysis, Computer Science, Computers
Maddox, Roberta; And Others – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1983
The development of a State University System of Florida data management system is discussed with special emphasis on its user controlled aspects. Major components described include system documentation, computer data files, regional data centers, computing networks, and uniform transaction systems. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Budgets, Centralization, College Administration, Data Processing
CAUSE/EFFECT, 1979
The operations of the Stanford Center for Information Processing (SCIP) at Stanford University are described: SCIP manages most of the centralized computing facilities at the university. (BH)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Centralization, College Administration, Computer Science
Clark, Donald W. – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1978
Consolidation of Central Washington University's computing capability to an off-campus state service center and the use of mini computers on campus is discussed. The mini computer system is cost effective and provides an efficient on-line interactive student information system for the small and medium size institution. (BH)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Centralization, Change Strategies, College Planning