NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 21 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Steven Higbee; Devany Harrell; Anthony Chase; Sharon Miller – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2025
Purpose: Engineering students gain confidence and competency through continual practice of key skills. The social cognitive theory construct of self-efficacy provides a useful measure to assess students' beliefs in their ability to succeed or perform tasks. Research focused on the impacts of curricular engineering design experiences on student…
Descriptors: Biomedicine, Engineering Education, Undergraduate Students, Self Efficacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
May M. Mansy; Ahmet Bilgili; Nat A. Thurlow; Kyung Seol – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2025
Challenge: In biomedical engineering education, curricular cohesion and expectations are crucial yet often not effectively communicated to the student. Novel Initiative: Our novel initiative addresses this challenge by leveraging senior design students within a junior-level biomedical instrumentation course. Through the interactive "Senior…
Descriptors: Biomedicine, Engineering Education, College Curriculum, Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lyn Denend; Ross Venook; Ravinder D. Pamnani; Kunj Sheth; Joseph Towles – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2024
In design-oriented biomedical engineering courses, some instructors teach need-driven methods for health technology innovation that use a "need statement" to reflect a student team's hypothesis about the most fruitful direction for their project. While need statements are of the utmost importance to the projects, we were not aware of any…
Descriptors: Scoring Rubrics, Biomedicine, Engineering Education, Student Projects
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Renee M. Clark; April A. Dukes; Lucille Sowko; Mark Gartner – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2025
Purpose: In 2018, the Department of Bioengineering and the School of Nursing at University of Pittsburgh implemented an interdisciplinary partnership that integrated senior nursing students into the bioengineering capstone Senior Design course as part of a National Institutes of Health education grant. This two-semester course requires senior…
Descriptors: Engineering Education, Nursing Education, Biomedicine, Interdisciplinary Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marissa L. Gray; Celinda M. Kofron – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2024
We have implemented a jigsaw framework in our biomedical engineering capstone design course by overlaying strategic consideration groups across our design teams. Collaboration in design courses is usually focused within a design team with some peer feedback, but opportunities to work across teams are often limited. The purpose of this teaching tip…
Descriptors: Biomedicine, Design, Cooperative Learning, Engineering Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sara Schley; Mel Chua; Joseph Le Doux; Veronica van Montfrans; Todd Fernandez – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2023
Human bodies vary widely: height, weight, blood volume, handedness, strength, and variations from disabilities, trauma, genetics, etc. Engineers must be trained to include human variance when designing human-interactive systems. Typically, this is not incorporated into mathematical and modeling focused courses. In the spring of 2019, one of three…
Descriptors: Human Body, Biomechanics, Cooperative Learning, Problem Solving
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
T. Claire Davies; Jesse Manzin; Maya Meraw; Deborah S. Munro – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2023
As students gain more experience with design concepts, they should progress from novice to expert design thinkers. The purpose of this research was to identify the constructs of growth in design thinking (DT) over short- (one weekend) and long-term (10 weeks) design challenges. A DT mindset questionnaire was completed by students in a third-year…
Descriptors: Biomedicine, Engineering Education, Design, Thinking Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Christine E. King; Beth A. Lopour – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2025
Challenge: In engineering classrooms, generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, such as ChatGPT, can supplement traditional teaching methods and have the potential to improve learning outcomes. However, there are also significant drawbacks, including the possibility of over-reliance on the tools and the hindrance of critical thinking, which…
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Concept Formation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Holly Golecki; Joe Bradley – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2024
Biomedical engineering capstone design courses provide a salient opportunity to discuss ethical considerations in engineering. As technology and society develop and change, new challenges constantly arise related to how society and technology inform each other. In this space, ethical training for engineering students is critically important for…
Descriptors: Experiential Learning, Decision Making, Ethics, Capstone Experiences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ruben D. Lopez-Parra; Tamara J. Moore – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2024
The design of biological systems is a multidisciplinary activity in which biomedical engineers collaborate to build novel biological systems that address society's needs. One of the most relevant skills for designing biological systems is engineering systems thinking (EST). Among the EST elements, the EST cognitive competencies are comparatively…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Biology, Thinking Skills, Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Justyn Jaworski; Michael Cho – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2023
The unique characteristics of the training needed for today's biomedical engineers can represent a challenge in curriculum design. Practical experiential learning for biomedical engineering undergraduates is important to prevent under-developed professional skills. In this teaching tips article, we provide an example of how to incorporate…
Descriptors: Curriculum Implementation, Experiential Learning, Service Learning, Biomedicine
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lauren M. Maloney; Christopher Page; Michael Bielski; Annie Rohan; Wei Yin – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2025
Challenge: The biomedical engineering (BME) capstone design courses are traditionally offered in students' senior year. Students often feel underprepared for the hands-on biodesign and prototyping process. Also, capstone design projects are often provided by BME faculty, without students' input in needs finding and screening. Novel Initiative: A…
Descriptors: Interdisciplinary Approach, Biomedicine, Engineering Education, Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rucha Joshi; Sujoy Ghosh; Alexander Simileysky; Mayank Bhanot – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2021
With a motivation to immerse students in engineering design, graphics communication, and computer aided design (CAD) skills early-on in the biomedical engineering curriculum, we launched a new 2-unit laboratory course on "Graphics Design in BME" in the Spring 2020 quarter for UC Davis sophomores. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the course…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Biomedicine, Laboratories, Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kay C. Dee – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2021
During the spring of 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was necessary to rapidly translate a new human-centered design studio course for first-year biomedical engineering students from a face-to-face delivery mode to a remote delivery mode. In addition to disrupting plans for hands-on design prototyping experiences, stay-at-home orders…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, College Freshmen, Biomedicine, Engineering Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alicia Fernandez-Fernandez; Walter Lee Murfee; Jeffrey A. LaMack; Teresa A. Murray – Biomedical Engineering Education, 2023
The main purpose of this paper is to share the Mentoring for INnovative Design Solutions (MINDS) Scholars Program developed by Alpha Eta Mu Beta, the International Biomedical Engineering Honor Society. The program's goals are to (1) introduce biomedical engineering students to an open-ended design experience as part of interuniversity teams with…
Descriptors: Mentors, Biomedicine, Engineering Education, Honor Societies
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2